CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

chatrace

Chatrace integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows. Use when the user wants to interact with Chatrace data.

Quality

76%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/chatrace/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a strong, command-first integration guide: every step is executable, the connection lifecycle is handled with explicit state checkpoints, and the proxy escape hatch is documented with a flag table. The only notable issues are a dangling 'Step 2' reference, minor filler sentences, and no content split into reference files.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is dominated by executable commands, tables, and flag references with almost no conceptual padding, but contains minor trimmable filler ('Use action names and parameters as needed.', 'This will burn less tokens and make communication more secure'). This matches anchor 4 (efficient with minor over-explanation); not 5 because a few filler sentences and the sparse Overview entity list earn no tokens.

4 / 5

Actionability

Every section gives copy-paste-ready commands with exact flags ('npm install -g @membranehq/cli@latest', 'membrane connection ensure "https://chatrace.com/" --json', 'membrane action run <actionId> --input "{...}"'), plus a popular-actions table with real action keys and a proxy flag table. This matches anchor 5 (fully executable, common cases covered); it is not 4 because no section relies on hints or pseudocode.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The install → login → connect → poll-until-ready → search → run → proxy sequence is clear, with state-based checkpoints (READY / CLIENT_ACTION_REQUIRED / CONFIGURATION_ERROR) and an explicit re-poll loop after user action. It matches anchor 4 (clear sequence, most checkpoints); not 5 because 'Step 2' is referenced but never labeled (the '1b' heading is an orphan) and post-run verification of the output is only implied.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The single-file body (~150 lines, no bundle files) is organized into clear sections (Install, Authentication, Connecting, Searching, Popular actions, Running, Proxy, Best practices) with no buried or nested references. This matches anchor 4 (good structure, content appropriately placed, minor organization gaps); not 5 because it exceeds the simple-skill threshold and keeps all detail inline without any one-level-deep reference split.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description has an explicit and well-scoped trigger ('Use when the user wants to interact with Chatrace data') anchored to a distinct niche platform, but the capability statement is generic. Listing the skill's concrete actions and richer trigger vocabulary would lift both specificity and trigger-term quality.

Suggestions

Replace the generic 'Manage data, records, and automate workflows' with concrete capabilities, e.g. 'Send text messages and flows to contacts, create contacts, and manage tags and custom fields in Chatrace.'

Expand trigger vocabulary to natural terms users would say, such as 'Chatrace contacts, messages, flows, tags, or broadcasts'.

Tighten the pairing of what and when so each named capability has a corresponding trigger phrase, matching the strongest reference examples.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description names the domain ('Chatrace integration') but the actions are generic ('Manage data, records, and automate workflows') with no concrete verbs like send messages, create contacts, or manage tags that the skill actually supports. It matches anchor 2 (domain named, actions minimal or generic); it is not 3 because no genuinely concrete action is listed.

2 / 5

Completeness

Both parts are present: a 'what' ('Manage data, records, and automate workflows') and an explicit 'when' ('Use when the user wants to interact with Chatrace data'), so it clears the cap for a missing trigger clause. It is not 5 because the 'what' is vague rather than a concrete capability list.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

'Chatrace' is a relevant natural keyword echoed in the trigger clause, but common user variations and synonyms (contacts, messages, flows, tags, broadcast) are absent. This fits anchor 3 (some relevant keywords, missing common variations); not 4 because keyword coverage is thin beyond the platform name itself.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

'Chatrace' is a niche platform name and the trigger clause is explicitly Chatrace-scoped, giving a clear niche with distinct triggers and minimal conflict risk with other skills. It is not 4 because nothing in the trigger language could plausibly fire a different skill.

5 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository

membranedev/application-skills

Path

skills/chatrace/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.