CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

checkvist

Checkvist integration. Manage Lists, Tags, Users, Teams. Use when the user wants to interact with Checkvist data.

Quality

71%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/checkvist/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a solid, command-driven integration guide with good state-handling and a clear overall workflow. Its main weaknesses are padded overview prose, an empty "Popular actions" section, and a dangling "Step 2" reference with inconsistent CLI invocation forms.

Suggestions

Delete the marketing overview paragraph ("Knowledge workers, project managers, and anyone who likes outlining can use it") — Claude already knows what Checkvist is — and remove the duplicated action-discovery command.

Populate "Popular actions" with 2-3 real examples (e.g. creating a task, listing lists) including concrete action IDs and inputs, instead of only repeating the discovery command.

Fix the dangling "skip to Step 2" reference by labeling the sections as Step 1/Step 2, and standardize on one CLI invocation form (membrane vs npx @membranehq/cli).

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Mostly efficient with concrete commands, but includes unnecessary padding: a marketing-style overview ("Knowledge workers, project managers, and anyone who likes outlining can use it") explaining what Checkvist is, and the action-discovery command duplicated in both "Searching for actions" and "Popular actions". Anchor 3 ("mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation or could be tightened"); not 4 because the filler is more than trimmable minor instances.

3 / 5

Actionability

Commands are concrete and copy-paste ready (install, login, connection ensure, action run with --input JSON, proxy flags table). Anchor 4 ("mostly executable guidance... minor gaps"), not 5 because the "Popular actions" section contains no actual example Checkvist actions (only the discovery command) and no end-to-end example of running one real action.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The sequence install → login → connect → poll → search → run → proxy fallback is clear, with explicit checkpoints for BUILDING/READY states, CLIENT_ACTION_REQUIRED handling, and error-field inspection. Anchor 4 ("clear sequence with most checkpoints present; minor validation gaps"), not 5 because "skip to Step 2" references a step label that doesn't exist, and the CLI is invoked inconsistently ("membrane" vs "npx @membranehq/cli").

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

A single self-contained file (~140 lines) with well-organized sections and no nested or buried references. Anchor 4 ("good structure; most content is appropriately placed; minor organization gaps"), not 5 because the vague "Checkvist Overview" tree ("Use action names and parameters as needed") is filler, and reference-grade detail (proxy flag table, connection-state enumeration) could live in a separate file.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

62%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is functional and correctly structured (clear what + explicit "Use when..." trigger, anchored by a distinctive product name), but it is thin. It leans on one generic verb ("Manage") and omits the natural synonyms (tasks, to-dos, checklists, outlines) users would actually say.

Suggestions

Replace the generic "Manage" with concrete action verbs, e.g. "Create and edit lists and tasks, apply tags, manage users and teams".

Add natural trigger synonyms users would say: "tasks", "to-dos", "checklists", "outlines", or "outliner".

Broaden the when-clause to cover common scenarios, e.g. "Use when the user wants to manage Checkvist lists, tasks, tags, or teams."

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

"Manage Lists, Tags, Users, Teams" names the domain and its objects, but relies on a single generic verb ("Manage") rather than several concrete actions. Anchor 3 ("names domain and 1-2 concrete actions, but not comprehensive") fits best; anchor 4 requires multiple specific action verbs like "creates, edits, applies tags".

3 / 5

Completeness

Both parts are present: the "what" ("Manage Lists, Tags, Users, Teams") and an explicit "when" ("Use when the user wants to interact with Checkvist data"). The when-clause is narrower and less concrete than anchor 5's "concrete trigger phrases", so anchor 4 ("both present; 'when' could be more explicit or specific") applies.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

"Checkvist" and "Lists, Tags, Users, Teams" are relevant keywords, but common natural variations users would say ("tasks", "to-dos", "checklists", "outlines", "projects") are absent. Anchor 3 ("some relevant keywords but missing common variations or synonyms"); not 2 since the app name and multiple entity terms are present.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

"Checkvist integration" is a clear niche trigger with minimal conflict when the product is named, but the generic words "Lists, Tags, Users, Teams" carry minor overlap risk with other list/task-management skills when the user doesn't mention Checkvist. Anchor 4 ("mostly distinct; minor overlap risk with closely related skills"), not 5.

4 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository

membranedev/application-skills

Path

skills/checkvist/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.