CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

chmeetings

ChMeetings integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows. Use when the user wants to interact with ChMeetings data.

Quality

68%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/chmeetings/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body delivers strong executable guidance: exact Membrane CLI commands for install, auth, connection setup with state handling, action discovery/execution, and proxied raw API calls. Weaknesses are a padded intro and feature list, dangling references to a nonexistent "Step 2", and no validation guidance for the destructive delete actions the skill advertises.

Suggestions

Cut the "ChMeetings Overview" bullet list and the intro paragraph about who uses the software — keep only the one-line description and the API docs link.

Fix the navigation references: either number the steps (Step 1: connect, Step 2: run actions) or replace the two "skip to **Step 2**" references with concrete section names like "Searching for actions".

Add a short validation note for destructive operations, e.g. "Before running delete-person or delete-family, fetch the record with get-person/get-family and confirm the ID with the user".

Include one worked example of running an action with real values, such as `membrane action run list-people --connectionId=<id> --input '{"page": 1}' --json`.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly lean commands and tables, but the two-sentence intro about who uses ChMeetings and the 24-item "ChMeetings Overview" feature bullet list (Meetings through Support) add ~30 lines of non-actionable padding. This fits 'Mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation or could be tightened'; not a 4 because the feature list and intro prose are clearly trimmable.

3 / 5

Actionability

Nearly every step has a copy-paste-ready command ("npm install -g @membranehq/cli@latest", "membrane connection ensure \"https://www.chmeetings.com/\" --json", "membrane action list --connectionId=... --intent ... --json") plus a flags table for proxy requests. Not a 5 because the parameter example is a generic '{"key": "value"}' and there is no worked end-to-end example with real values (e.g. running list-people against a connection id); not a 3 because all guidance is executable, not pseudocode.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The setup sequence is present and state-aware (poll until READY, branch on CLIENT_ACTION_REQUIRED / CONFIGURATION_ERROR, re-poll after user action), but the text twice says "skip to **Step 2**" while no Step 2 (or numbered Step 1) exists, and the skill exposes destructive actions (delete-family, delete-person) with no validation/verification guidance — the rubric caps destructive-operation workflows without validation at 3. Not a 2 because the sequence and state checkpoints are otherwise concrete and coherent.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

This is a single-file skill with no bundle files, and its section structure (Install, Authentication, Connecting, Searching, Popular actions, Running, Proxy, Best practices) is clear and well-ordered for navigation at its ~180-line size. Not a 5 because the popular-actions table and detailed connection-state handling are borderline content that could live in a reference file, and the feature-list section is structureless padding; not a 3 because nothing is buried and no content is misplaced.

4 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Description

61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description correctly names the niche app and includes an explicit 'Use when...' trigger clause, giving it strong distinctiveness and acceptable completeness. Its main weaknesses are generic action language ('manage data, records, and automate workflows') and missing the natural church-management vocabulary (members, attendance, giving, groups) users would actually say.

Suggestions

Replace generic verbs with concrete ChMeetings capabilities, e.g. "Manage members, families, and groups; record attendance and contributions; run contribution-batch and campaign-pledge operations".

Expand the trigger clause with natural phrases users would say: "Use when the user mentions ChMeetings, church management, member records, attendance tracking, or church giving/contributions".

Drop the padding phrase "automate workflows" unless a concrete workflow capability is named — it adds no distinguishable information.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

"Manage data, records, and automate workflows" names the ChMeetings domain but every action is generic — none are concrete like "track attendance" or "manage member giving". It matches the anchor 'Names the domain but actions are minimal or generic'; it is not a 3 because no specific concrete action is listed, and not a 1 because the domain is clearly identified.

2 / 5

Completeness

It has both parts: a what ("Manage data, records, and automate workflows") and an explicit when ("Use when the user wants to interact with ChMeetings data"). Not a 3 because the 'when' is explicitly stated rather than weakly implied; not a 5 because the 'what' is generic and the trigger phrase is a single broad clause rather than concrete trigger phrases.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

"ChMeetings" is the key natural term and users would say it, but the description misses the vocabulary users actually use with this app — "church management", "members", "attendance", "groups", "giving". This fits 'Some relevant keywords but missing common variations or synonyms'; a 4 would require broader natural-term coverage.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The description is anchored entirely on "ChMeetings", a niche church-management application, so it occupies a clear niche with minimal conflict risk — a request triggering this skill would unambiguously belong to it. It is not a 4 because there is no closely related skill whose triggers would overlap with the ChMeetings name.

5 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository

membranedev/application-skills

Path

skills/chmeetings/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.