Content
57%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body provides concrete, mostly copy-paste-ready Membrane CLI commands with a clear connection-setup state machine, making it genuinely actionable. Weaknesses are the padded marketing intro, a dangling 'Step 2' reference, no validation guidance for destructive actions like delete-contact, and a monolithic action catalog that belongs in a separate reference file.
Suggestions
Remove the marketing/background paragraph and the filler lines ('Use action names and parameters as needed', the Agent Types aside), keeping only what the agent needs to operate the CLI.
Fix the workflow numbering — either label 'Searching for actions' as Step 2 and the connection steps as Step 1, or drop the 'skip to Step 2' phrasing — and add a verification step before destructive actions like delete-contact (e.g. get-contact first, confirm with the user, then delete).
Add one end-to-end example of running a listed action (e.g. membrane action list --intent 'list contacts' followed by membrane action run with the returned id), and consider moving the full action catalog to a references/ file with a few key examples inline.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient command examples and tables, but the marketing-flavored intro ('Small to medium-sized businesses... use Cliengo to improve customer engagement and increase sales conversions'), the empty line 'Use action names and parameters as needed', and the awkward Agent Types note are unnecessary padding. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete executable commands cover install, login (including headless fallback), connection setup with --wait polling, action search/run with JSON input, and proxy usage with a flags table. Minor gap: the popular-actions table lists keys rather than actionIds and there is no end-to-end example of invoking one of the listed actions. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The setup sequence is present with state-based branching (READY / BUILDING / CLIENT_ACTION_REQUIRED with re-polling), but 'skip to Step 2' is a dangling reference (no Step 1 or Step 2 headings exist), and destructive operations like delete-contact appear in the actions table with no validation or verification guidance, capping this dimension at 3 per the rubric. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized with clear headers and no nested references (no bundle files exist), but the 20-row popular-actions catalog is reference material inlined in SKILL.md that could live in a separate file, and there is no layering to deeper material. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 13 / 20 Passed |