CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

codesee

CodeSee integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows. Use when the user wants to interact with CodeSee data.

59

Quality

68%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/codesee/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is highly actionable with complete CLI commands and a well-sequenced, state-driven connection workflow including validation checkpoints. Weaknesses are minor verbosity/filler, a redundant section, and loose step numbering.

Suggestions

Remove the redundant 'Popular actions' section (it repeats the 'Searching for actions' command) or fold it into that section.

Fix the workflow numbering: label the connection steps consistently (1a/1b or 1/2) and define the 'Step 2' that is referenced but never shown.

Cut vague filler like 'When to use which actions: Use action names and parameters as needed.' and the abstract Workspace/Diagram/File hierarchy unless it guides a concrete decision.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Mostly command-focused and efficient, but includes padded or vague filler ('When to use which actions: Use action names and parameters as needed'), an abstract Workspace/Diagram/File hierarchy, and a 'Popular actions' section that repeats the earlier 'Searching for actions' command.

3 / 5

Actionability

Provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands covering the common cases (install, login, headless auth, connection ensure, polling, action list/run, proxy) with flags and JSON examples.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The connection workflow has a clear state-machine sequence with feedback loops (poll until READY, handle CLIENT_ACTION_REQUIRED, re-poll), but the numbering is loose ('1b' with no '1a', an undefined 'Step 2' reference).

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The skill is self-contained with well-organized sections and no external files needed, but the abstract overview and the redundant 'Popular actions' section leave minor organization gaps.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Description

62%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is third-person and answers both 'what' and 'when' with an explicit trigger clause, anchored to a distinct named tool. Its main weakness is generic verb choices ('manage', 'automate') that limit specificity and trigger-term richness.

Suggestions

Replace generic verbs with concrete CodeSee actions, e.g. 'Visualize codebases, explore diagrams, and trace dependencies' instead of 'Manage data, records, and automate workflows'.

Broaden the trigger clause to capture natural user phrasings, e.g. 'Use when the user wants to map, visualize, or explore a codebase, or mentions CodeSee, code maps, or architecture diagrams'.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain (CodeSee) and a couple of actions ('Manage data, records', 'automate workflows'), but the verbs are generic and not comprehensive, matching the anchor for 1-2 concrete actions.

3 / 5

Completeness

Both a 'what' ('Manage data, records, and automate workflows') and an explicit 'when' ('Use when the user wants to interact with CodeSee data') are present, though the 'when' could be more specific.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes the core term 'CodeSee' plus 'data', 'records', 'workflows', but misses common variations or synonyms and the trigger phrasing is narrow ('interact with CodeSee data').

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The named tool 'CodeSee' gives it a clear niche with minimal conflict risk, though the generic 'manage data/records/automate workflows' phrasing could overlap with closely related data tools.

4 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
membranedev/application-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.