Content
63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body delivers strong executable guidance: real CLI commands for auth, connection setup with state-aware polling, action search/execution, and a proxy escape hatch. Weaknesses are an introductory paragraph and capability bullets that explain what Claude already knows, incoherent step numbering ('Step 2' and '1b' with no anchors), and no progressive disclosure despite a length that warrants splitting detail into reference files.
Suggestions
Cut the opening paragraph explaining what Cohere is and merge the Overview bullets into the Popular actions table, which already conveys the same capability list.
Fix the sequence labeling: either number the steps ('Step 1: Connect', 'Step 2: Search actions') or drop the 'skip to Step 2' and '1b' references.
Add one fully worked end-to-end example (e.g. running the embed action with a real --input payload and the resulting output), and move the connection-state/clientAction internals and proxy flag table into a references/ file.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body opens with background Claude already knows ("Cohere provides access to advanced language models through an API. Developers and businesses use it to build AI-powered applications...") and the Overview bullets re-explain familiar concepts ("Creates vector representations of text for semantic search") while partially duplicating the Popular actions table. The command sections themselves are compact, so this is 'mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation'. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete copy-paste-ready commands cover install, login, connection, action discovery/execution with JSON input, and proxying, plus a flag table. Minor gaps keep it below 5: no fully worked example with real values, the action table lists 'Key' values while run examples use an undefined '<actionId>' placeholder, and COMMAND_ID/actionId correspondence is never stated. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The sequence (install CLI, login, connect, handle states, search actions, run, proxy fallback) is clear, and the connection-state polling loop with CLIENT_ACTION_REQUIRED handling is an explicit checkpoint with a retry path. However, the text says 'skip to Step 2' though no 'Step 2' heading exists, and a '#### 1b' section appears with no '1a' or 'Step 1', leaving the numbering incoherent — minor sequence/labeling gaps consistent with a 4. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a single-file skill with no references/, scripts/, or assets/ directories; at ~148 lines it exceeds the 50-line simple-skill threshold, and inline material that could live in reference files (the detailed connection-state/clientAction internals, the proxy flag reference table) is all in SKILL.md. Structure via headers and tables is decent, matching 'some structure but content that should be separate is inline'. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |