CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

copernica

Copernica integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows. Use when the user wants to interact with Copernica data.

62

Quality

74%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/copernica/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is highly actionable with executable Membrane CLI commands and a well-structured connection workflow including feedback loops, though the step-numbering is inconsistent and "Step 2" is referenced but never defined.

Suggestions

Define "Step 2" explicitly (e.g., add a "## Step 2: Run an action" heading) or remove the dangling "Skip to Step 2" references.

Fix the inconsistent numbering: the "1b. Wait for the connection" heading has no "1a" counterpart — rename to a coherent step sequence.

Add a brief validation/verification checkpoint after running actions or proxy requests (e.g., check the response `error`/`output` field) to support batch or destructive operations.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Commands and code blocks are lean and direct, with only minor over-explanation (the marketing-automation intro and the "focus on the integration logic rather than auth plumbing" rationale), fitting anchor 4 rather than the fully lean anchor 5.

4 / 5

Actionability

It provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands for install, login, connection, action discovery, action execution, and proxy requests, plus a complete proxy-flag table covering the common cases, matching anchor 5.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The connection flow is sequenced with explicit state-based checkpoints and a poll-after-action feedback loop, but "Step 2" is referenced yet never defined and the numbering ("1b" with no "1a") is inconsistent, leaving minor navigation gaps that keep it below 5.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The single-file body is well-organized with clear section headers and no monolithic reference dump, but the dangling "Step 2" cross-reference slightly weakens navigation, placing it at anchor 4 rather than a clean 5.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

66%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description clearly identifies the Copernica niche and includes an explicit "Use when" trigger, but its capability verbs are generic and it lacks the natural synonyms (campaigns, profiles, email) a user would actually say.

Suggestions

Replace generic verbs ("Manage data, records, and automate workflows") with concrete actions, e.g. "Manage Copernica databases, profiles, email/SMS campaigns, and templates."

Broaden trigger terms with natural user phrases such as "Copernica campaigns", "Copernica profiles", or "Copernica email marketing".

Make the "when" clause more concrete by listing the trigger contexts (databases, profiles, marketing automation) rather than the generic "interact with Copernica data".

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

"Manage data, records, and automate workflows" names the domain with a couple of actions, but the actions are generic and not comprehensive, matching anchor 3 rather than the several specific actions needed for 4.

3 / 5

Completeness

It states both a clear "what" ("Manage data, records, and automate workflows") and an explicit "when" ("Use when the user wants to interact with Copernica data"), but the "when" is somewhat generic so it does not reach the concrete trigger phrases of 5.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

"Copernica", "data", "records", and "workflows" are relevant keywords but common user variations (campaigns, profiles, email marketing) are missing, fitting anchor 3.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Naming a specific platform ("Copernica integration", "interact with Copernica data") gives a clear niche with distinct triggers and minimal conflict risk, matching anchor 5.

5 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
membranedev/application-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.