CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

emailable

Emailable integration. Manage Persons, Organizations. Use when the user wants to interact with Emailable data.

55

Quality

62%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/emailable/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a solid, actionable CLI integration reference with concrete commands, a clear connection state machine, and good sectioning. Its main weaknesses are light prose padding and a few minor validation/placeholder gaps in the action-running workflow rather than structural problems.

Suggestions

Trim editorial padding such as 'so you can focus on the integration logic rather than auth plumbing' and 'This is the fastest way to get a connection' to improve token efficiency.

Add an explicit verification checkpoint after running batch actions, e.g. poll get-batch-status until complete, to strengthen the batch-operation workflow.

Clarify or remove the bare 'Emailable Overview' bullet list (Email/Draft/Contact/Sequence/Template/Tag), which is currently unexplained.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly efficient with concrete commands, but includes padded phrasing like 'so you can focus on the integration logic rather than auth plumbing' and 'This is the fastest way to get a connection.' This fits anchor 3 ('Mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation or could be tightened'), not 4 which requires only minor trimmable instances.

3 / 5

Actionability

It provides concrete, copy-paste-ready commands (membrane login, connection ensure, action list/run, request) with parameters and flag tables. Minor gaps (CONNECTION_ID placeholders, no full end-to-end example) keep it at anchor 4 ('Mostly executable guidance; concrete code or commands with minor gaps') rather than 5.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The connection workflow is clearly sequenced with polling and state-based feedback loops (READY/BUILDING/CLIENT_ACTION_REQUIRED, re-poll after user action). Minor validation gaps in the action-running section place it at anchor 4 ('Clear sequence with most checkpoints present; minor validation gaps') rather than 5.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist; the single SKILL.md is well-organized into clear sections (Install, Authentication, Connecting, Searching, Popular actions, Proxy, Best practices) with content appropriately inline for a CLI integration skill. It matches anchor 4 ('Good structure; most content appropriately placed; minor organization gaps') rather than 5, which expects well-signaled one-level-deep references.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

57%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description correctly includes an explicit 'Use when' trigger and names the target domain, but the capabilities are stated generically ('Manage') and the trigger relies solely on the brand name without natural synonyms. It is functional but could be sharper and more concrete about what Emailable actually does (email verification).

Suggestions

Replace the generic verb 'Manage' with concrete actions Emailable performs, e.g. 'Verify email addresses, run batch verifications, and check account info.'

Add natural trigger terms users would say, such as 'email verification', 'validate email', or 'check email deliverability', not just the brand name.

Make the 'when' clause more specific, e.g. 'Use when the user wants to verify email deliverability or run batch email verification with Emailable.'

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description names the Emailable domain and two entities ('Manage Persons, Organizations'), but the action verb 'Manage' is generic and not concrete. It sits below the midpoint toward anchor 2 ('Names the domain but actions are minimal or generic') rather than 3, which requires 1-2 concrete actions.

2 / 5

Completeness

It states a 'what' ('Manage Persons, Organizations') and an explicit 'when' ('Use when the user wants to interact with Emailable data'), but the trigger is generic rather than concrete. This fits anchor 4 ('Has both what and when; when could be more explicit or specific'), not 5 which requires concrete trigger phrases.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

The only natural keyword is the brand name 'Emailable' (in 'interact with Emailable data'); common user synonyms like 'email verification', 'validate email', or 'email checking' are absent. It matches anchor 3 ('Some relevant keywords but missing common variations or synonyms').

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The brand-specific term 'Emailable' carves a distinct niche, but 'Manage Persons, Organizations' overlaps with general CRM/contact-management skills, leaving minor conflict risk. This matches anchor 4 ('Mostly distinct; minor overlap risk with closely related skills').

4 / 5

Total

13

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
membranedev/application-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.