CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

flare

Flare integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows. Use when the user wants to interact with Flare data.

60

Quality

70%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/flare/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a strong, actionable reference built around concrete executable membrane commands and a connection workflow with genuine validation checkpoints. Its main weaknesses are minor prose padding and a couple of structural loose ends rather than any substantive gap.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly lean and command-driven with minimal padding, but contains minor over-explanation such as "so you can focus on the integration logic rather than auth plumbing," fitting the efficient-with-trimmable-prose anchor.

4 / 5

Actionability

It provides copy-paste ready membrane commands (login, connection ensure, action list/run, request) with flags and a full proxy-options table covering the common cases, matching the fully-executable anchor.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The connection flow has an explicit sequence with state-checking and a poll-to-act-to-re-poll feedback loop, but an undefined "Step 2" reference and slightly fragmented sections leave minor gaps, fitting the clear-sequence-with-most-checkpoints anchor.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Content is well-organized into clear single-file sections with no nested references, though at ~155 lines the proxy flag table and clientAction detail could arguably live in a separate reference file, matching the good-structure-with-minor-gaps anchor.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

57%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description explicitly covers both what the skill does and when to use it, anchored by the distinct Flare brand, but relies on generic action language that limits specificity and trigger-term richness. It is functional and triggerable but would benefit from concrete capabilities and more natural user phrasings.

Suggestions

Replace generic verbs with concrete Flare-specific actions (e.g., "view and triage errors, manage projects and teams, search error events") to lift specificity.

Add natural trigger phrasings users would actually say, such as "when the user mentions error tracking, Flare, or wants to investigate production errors," including synonyms and the flareapp.io domain.

Tighten the what/when pairing so the capability list mirrors the trigger terms, reducing overlap risk with generic data-management skills.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description names the Flare domain but its actions ("Manage data, records, and automate workflows") are generic verbs rather than concrete capabilities, matching the anchor that names the domain with minimal/generic actions.

2 / 5

Completeness

Both a "what" (Flare integration managing data, records, workflows) and an explicit "when" clause are present; the when is clear but the what is somewhat generic, fitting the anchor where both exist with minor weakness.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

"Use when the user wants to interact with Flare data" supplies some relevant keywords (Flare, data) but lacks common synonyms or variations a user might naturally say, matching the anchor for partial keyword coverage.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The Flare brand gives a clear niche with a distinct trigger, but the generic action verbs (manage data, records, automate workflows) create minor overlap risk with broad data skills, matching the mostly-distinct anchor.

4 / 5

Total

13

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
membranedev/application-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.