CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

flexera

Flexera integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows. Use when the user wants to interact with Flexera data.

56

Quality

64%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/flexera/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a competent, command-heavy integration guide with a strong connection-state workflow, but it carries a large padded entity inventory, no progressive-disclosure references, and no validation guidance for destructive proxy/action operations. It reads as a solid auto-generated integration skill rather than a hand-tuned one.

Suggestions

Move the ~100-line Flexera entity inventory into a separate references file (e.g. references/entities.md) and replace it inline with a one-line pointer, recovering token budget and improving progressive disclosure.

Add a verify-before-execute checkpoint for destructive operations, e.g. before running actions or proxy requests with POST/PUT/DELETE, confirm the target and dry-run/read first.

Replace the redundant "Popular actions" section (which re-states the discovery command) with a concrete example: a sample action list output and a real action run invocation with its result.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The command-focused sections are lean, but the ~100-line "Flexera Overview" bullet inventory of entity names is pure token padding that tells Claude nothing actionable, matching the 3 anchor (mostly efficient with unnecessary padded content that could be trimmed). It is not a 2 because only one section is the main offender and the rest assume Claude's competence.

3 / 5

Actionability

Concrete, copy-paste-ready CLI commands cover the common cases (install, login, connection ensure, action list/run, request proxy), matching the 4 anchor (mostly executable with minor gaps). It falls short of 5 because the "Popular actions" section repeats discovery without a concrete example action or sample output, and parameters use placeholders.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The connect-to-run sequence is clearly ordered with explicit state-based checkpoints (READY / CLIENT_ACTION_REQUIRED / CONFIGURATION_ERROR) and a poll-again feedback loop, matching the 4 anchor. It is not a 5 because the action-running and proxy phases (which support destructive HTTP methods like DELETE) lack any verify-before-execute validation step.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The body has clear section headers and logical organization, but the large inline entity inventory is content that belongs in a separate reference file and no external references are signaled at all, matching the 3 anchor (structure present but content that should be separate is inline). The under-50-lines exception does not apply to this ~250-line skill.

3 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Description

66%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is well-formed with an explicit Use-when clause and a distinctive named-product trigger, but its action language is generic and trigger coverage is thin (a single keyword with no synonyms). It is a solid, conventional description that would benefit from more concrete capability verbs.

Suggestions

Replace generic verbs ("manage data, records, automate workflows") with concrete Flexera capabilities such as "optimize cloud spend", "track software licenses", or "rightsize resources".

Broaden trigger terms beyond the single word "Flexera" to include natural phrases users say, e.g. "cloud costs", "software licenses", "IT asset data".

Tighten the when clause to name the concrete scenarios (license compliance, cloud cost optimization, asset inventory) rather than the abstract "interact with Flexera data".

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

"Manage data, records, and automate workflows" names the Flexera domain plus a few actions, but the verbs are generic rather than concrete (no "extract", "fill", "convert"-style specifics). It clears the 3 anchor (domain + 1-2 actions, not comprehensive) but lacks the several specific actions needed for a 4.

3 / 5

Completeness

It states both what ("Flexera integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows") and an explicit when ("Use when the user wants to interact with Flexera data"), matching the 4 anchor where both are present but the when could be more specific (no mentions of licenses, cloud costs, etc.).

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

The natural keyword a user would say ("Flexera" / "Flexera data") is present via "Use when the user wants to interact with Flexera data", but there are no synonyms or variations beyond the single proper noun, matching the 3 anchor (some relevant keywords, missing common variations).

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

"Flexera" is a distinct named product with triggers ("interact with Flexera data") that would not plausibly fire for another skill, matching the 5 anchor for a clear niche with minimal conflict risk.

5 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
membranedev/application-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.