CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

gitpod

Gitpod integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows. Use when the user wants to interact with Gitpod data.

55

Quality

62%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/gitpod/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is actionable and well-structured with executable commands and a sensible workflow, but it spends tokens explaining Gitpod basics Claude already knows. Trimming the intro and fixing the undefined 'Step 2' reference would push it higher.

Suggestions

Delete or compress the opening 'Gitpod is an online IDE...' paragraph; Claude already knows what Gitpod is.

Label the section referenced as 'Step 2' (or reword the 'skip to Step 2' instruction) so the workflow navigation resolves.

Trim soft commentary like 'so you can focus on the integration logic rather than auth plumbing' that adds tokens without guidance.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The opening paragraph explains what Gitpod is ('Gitpod is an online IDE that allows developers to create ready-to-code development environments in the cloud...') — a concept Claude already knows — plus minor fluff like 'so you can focus on the integration logic rather than auth plumbing'.

3 / 5

Actionability

Concrete, copy-paste-ready commands cover install, login, connection, polling, action search/run, and proxying, with a flag reference table; placeholders like CONNECTION_ID and <actionId> require substitution, leaving minor gaps.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

There is a clear install→authenticate→connect→poll→search→run sequence with state-polling validation checkpoints, but 'Step 2' is referenced without a corresponding labeled section, a minor gap.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The single-file body is well-organized with clear section headers (Overview, Working with Gitpod, Popular actions, Best practices) and no external references are needed, though all content is inlined.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

57%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description has an explicit trigger clause and a clear niche, but its capability list is generic rather than concrete. Tightening the action verbs and adding trigger synonyms would lift it from mid-range.

Suggestions

Replace generic verbs with concrete Gitpod-specific capabilities (e.g., 'Create and manage workspaces, ports, and running workspaces, and automate workflow templates').

Add natural trigger variations beyond a single keyword (e.g., 'Use when the user mentions Gitpod workspaces, dev environments, or cloud IDEs').

Drop vague filler ('Manage data, records') that does not describe a real Gitpod action.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

It names the domain ("Gitpod integration") but the actions — "Manage data, records, and automate workflows" — are minimal and generic rather than concrete capabilities, matching the score-2 anchor.

2 / 5

Completeness

Both a what ("Gitpod integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows.") and an explicit when ("Use when the user wants to interact with Gitpod data.") are present, though the what is generic.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

"Gitpod" is a natural keyword a user would say, and "interact with Gitpod data" is a usable trigger, but there is only one keyword with no synonyms or variations, matching the score-3 anchor.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

"Gitpod integration" carves a clear niche with a distinct trigger, but the generic verbs ("manage data, records, automate workflows") create minor overlap risk with adjacent skills.

4 / 5

Total

13

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
membranedev/application-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.