Conciseness

The body is command-heavy and largely lean, with concrete bash snippets earning their place; minor over-explanation remains in the best-practices rationale, the agent-types line, and the intro. Not a 5 because of these trimmable prose passages; not a 3 because it is not noticeably verbose or padded.

Actionability

Mostly executable, copy-paste-ready commands cover install, auth, connect, search, run, and proxy. Not a 5 because it uses placeholder intents ('--intent "QUERY"') and never shows a concrete Greptile code-search example, and the 'Greptile Overview' section is sparse; not a 3 because the guidance is real executable commands rather than pseudocode.

Workflow Clarity

Clear sequence (install → auth → connect → poll → search → run → proxy) with an explicit polling feedback loop and state branching (READY / CLIENT_ACTION_REQUIRED / CONFIGURATION_ERROR). Not a 5 because 'Step 2' is referenced without coherent numbering and action-run outputs are not validated; not a 3 because explicit checkpoints and error recovery are present, and the skill is not destructive/batch so the cap does not apply.

Progressive Disclosure

Good section structure with clear headers and no nested references in a single file with no bundle files. Not a 5 because some sections are thin or redundant ('Greptile Overview' bullets, 'Popular actions' overlaps 'Searching for actions') and there is no file-level disclosure; not a 3 because the structure is well-organized and navigable.

Specificity

Names the domain ('Greptile integration') and lists 2-3 actions ('Manage data, records, and automate workflows'), but the actions are generic and omit what Greptile actually does (search/analyze source code). Not a 4 because the actions lack concrete specificity; not a 2 because multiple actions are named rather than a single generic one.

Completeness

Provides both a 'what' ('Greptile integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows.') and an explicit 'when' ('Use when the user wants to interact with Greptile data.'). Not a 5 because the 'when' lacks concrete trigger phrases (no mention of search/code); not a 3 because an explicit 'Use when' clause is present, so the missing-trigger cap does not apply.

Trigger Term Quality

Includes the brand keyword 'Greptile' and 'data/records', but misses the natural phrases users would say ('search code', 'query repositories', 'find code'). Not a 4 because keyword coverage is thin and lacks common variations; not a 2 because relevant brand and data terms are present.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The 'Greptile' brand name in both the what and when gives it a distinct niche and trigger, but the generic 'manage data, records, automate workflows' phrasing is shared across many integration skills, creating minor overlap risk. Not a 5 because the actions are generic rather than comprehensively distinct; not a 3 because the brand anchor is specific.