CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

hansei

Hansei integration. Manage Organizations, Pipelines, Projects, Users, Filters. Use when the user wants to interact with Hansei data.

56

Quality

65%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/hansei/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

68%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is actionable and token-efficient, leading the user through a concrete Membrane CLI workflow with executable commands. Its main weakness is workflow_clarity: destructive/batch proxy requests lack explicit validation checkpoints and error-recovery loops.

Suggestions

Add a validation checkpoint after connecting (e.g., run a trivial `action list` to confirm the connection works) and a fix/retry loop for failed connections.

For proxy `request` calls that may be destructive (DELETE/PUT/PATCH), add an explicit verify step before and after, and guidance to confirm affected resource IDs.

Tighten the intro paragraph and best-practices bullets to remove mild padding (e.g., "This will burn less tokens").

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly lean, built around executable command snippets and tables with only minor over-explanation (e.g., the brief Hansei intro and "burn less tokens" phrasing); it does not pad with generic Claude knowledge.

4 / 5

Actionability

Provides copy-paste-ready commands throughout (install, login, search, connect, action list/run, request) with placeholders and a flag table, covering the common cases with only minor gaps around input schema construction.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear install→login→connect→search→run sequence exists with a check-existing-connections branch, but there are no validate→fix→retry feedback loops; because proxy requests can be destructive/batch, the missing validation caps this at 3.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist and the skill is a single self-contained file with well-organized sections and no nested references; it is slightly over the 50-line simple-skill threshold, so it sits at 4 rather than 5.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

62%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is third-person, names concrete entities, and includes an explicit Use-when clause, satisfying both what and when. It is held back from the top band by a single generic action verb and a non-varied trigger phrase.

Suggestions

Replace the single verb "Manage" with several distinct concrete actions (e.g., create, list, update, filter) to lift specificity.

Broaden the trigger phrase with natural variations, e.g. "Use when the user wants to list, create, or filter Hansei organizations, pipelines, projects, or users."

Add file-format or noun synonyms users actually say to improve trigger term coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain (Hansei) and five concrete entities to "Manage" (Organizations, Pipelines, Projects, Users, Filters), but relies on a single generic action verb rather than enumerating multiple distinct actions.

3 / 5

Completeness

Provides a clear "what" (manage Organizations, Pipelines, Projects, Users, Filters) and an explicit "when" clause, though the trigger is generic rather than concrete; not a 5 because trigger phrases are not varied or specific.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes "Use when the user wants to interact with Hansei data" with the proper noun Hansei, but lacks common synonyms or variations a user would naturally say.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The proper noun Hansei carves a clear niche with low conflict risk, but the generic "interact with Hansei data" trigger leaves minor overlap risk versus other data-integration skills.

4 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
membranedev/application-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.