CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

helpspace

Helpspace integration. Manage Organizations. Use when the user wants to interact with Helpspace data.

51

Quality

56%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/helpspace/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is a solid, command-driven integration guide with good actionability and a well-structured connection flow. Its main weaknesses are mild prose padding, missing validation guidance around destructive operations, and a broken 'Step 2' cross-reference.

Suggestions

Add a validation/confirmation checkpoint before running destructive actions (e.g., verify the target ID and confirm with the user before delete-ticket/delete-customer).

Fix the dangling 'Step 2' references by labeling the next section 'Step 2: Search for actions' or removing the 'Step 2' phrasing.

Trim the introductory Helpspace description and best-practices prose to reduce token overhead while keeping the command examples intact.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Most of the body is command-focused and efficient, but the intro paragraph explains what Helpspace is and several prose asides ('so you can focus on the integration logic', 'burn less tokens') could be trimmed.

3 / 5

Actionability

Concrete, copy-paste-ready CLI commands cover install, auth, connect, search, run, and proxy, plus a flags table and an actions table; minor gaps are the abstract placeholders and absence of a full worked end-to-end example.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The connection-readiness flow is well sequenced with state-based checkpoints and polling feedback, but destructive actions (delete ticket/customer) lack validation steps and 'Step 2' is referenced but never labeled, capping clarity.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Single-file skill with a clear section structure and no nested references; the large inline popular-actions table and dangling 'Step 2' references are minor organization gaps rather than structural problems.

4 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Description

52%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description has a clear, low-conflict trigger tied to a distinct product name, but its capability statement is generic and misaligned with the skill's real function. Strengthening the 'what' with concrete actions would materially improve it.

Suggestions

Replace the generic 'Manage Organizations' with the actual capabilities, e.g. 'Manage Helpspace tickets, customers, tasks, and knowledge-base articles'.

Broaden the trigger phrase beyond the product name, e.g. 'Use when the user wants to manage Helpspace tickets, customers, or support conversations'.

Ensure the capability list matches the body's documented actions (tickets, customers, tasks) rather than 'Organizations'.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description names the domain (Helpspace) but offers only one generic action ('Manage Organizations'), which is minimal and does not match the skill's actual capabilities (tickets, customers, tasks).

2 / 5

Completeness

An explicit 'Use when' trigger is present, but the 'what' is reduced to a label ('Helpspace integration') plus a single generic and arguably inaccurate action, so it does not clearly convey what the skill does.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

The trigger 'Use when the user wants to interact with Helpspace data' relies on the product name as the keyword; it is reasonably natural but lacks common synonyms or variations.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The Helpspace product name is a distinct niche trigger with minimal overlap risk; it would only fire for Helpspace-specific needs.

5 / 5

Total

13

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
membranedev/application-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.