CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

incidentio

Incident.Io integration. Manage Incidents, Services, Integrations. Use when the user wants to interact with Incident.Io data.

58

Quality

67%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/incidentio/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is a solid, actionable guide to the Membrane CLI integration with concrete commands and a well-structured connection workflow. It loses points for intro/marketing fluff, a dangling "Step 2" reference, and missing validation guidance for destructive incident mutations.

Suggestions

Remove the marketing intro paragraph ("helps teams respond... used by engineers, SREs, and security teams") and the irrelevant PagerDuty documentation URL to tighten conciseness.

Fix or remove the dangling "Step 2" reference, or relabel the follow-on sections (Searching for actions, Running actions) as an explicit numbered sequence so the end-to-end workflow is unambiguous.

Add a validation/confirmation checkpoint for destructive operations, e.g. confirm or dry-run before create-incident/update-incident and verify the returned incident state afterward.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Most of the body is tight, CLI-specific guidance Claude would not know, but the intro marketing line ("helps teams respond to and resolve incidents faster... used by engineers, SREs, and security teams") and an irrelevant PagerDuty documentation URL are trimmable padding, keeping it below the 4-anchor.

3 / 5

Actionability

Concrete copy-paste commands ("membrane connection ensure", "membrane action run ... --input", the proxy flags table) cover the common cases, with only minor gaps such as no worked parameter example for create-incident/update-incident.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The connection flow is well sequenced with state checks and a re-poll feedback loop, but the reference to "Step 2" is dangling (no labeled Step 2) and destructive incident create/update operations lack validation or verification steps, which caps this dimension at 3 per the destructive-operations guideline.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

With no bundle files present, the body is organized into clear, well-labeled sections with the actions table reasonably placed inline; it is above the 3-anchor though not a 5 since the ~175-line body exceeds the simple under-50-line case.

4 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Description

73%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A concise, well-formed description that clearly states the product, a few managed entities, and an explicit "Use when" trigger. Its main weakness is the generic verb "Manage", which keeps specificity and completeness just below the top anchors.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

"Manage Incidents, Services, Integrations" names the domain and three objects, but the single generic verb "Manage" is not the concrete, varied action set of the 4-anchor (e.g. extract/fill/convert); it sits above the 2-anchor which only names the domain.

3 / 5

Completeness

It answers both "what" ("Manage Incidents, Services, Integrations") and "when" ("Use when the user wants to interact with Incident.Io data"), but the "what" is somewhat generic, so it does not fully match the 5-anchor's concrete multi-trigger phrasing.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

"Incident.Io", "Incidents, Services, Integrations", and "interact with Incident.Io data" give good keyword coverage of the product name and main entities a user would say, missing only some natural phrasing variations to reach the 5-anchor.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Naming the specific SaaS product "Incident.Io" twice gives it a clear niche with distinct triggers and minimal conflict risk with other skills, matching the 5-anchor.

5 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
membranedev/application-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.