CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

inplayer

InPlayer integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows. Use when the user wants to interact with InPlayer data.

61

Quality

72%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/inplayer/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a strong, executable guide to driving InPlayer through the Membrane CLI, with concrete commands covering connection, action discovery, execution, and proxying. Weaknesses are minor: a few marketing-fluff lines and slightly inconsistent step numbering in the connection workflow.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly lean commands and tables, but contains minor over-explanation such as the marketing line 'so you can focus on the integration logic rather than auth plumbing' and rationale padding in Best practices.

4 / 5

Actionability

It provides copy-paste-ready commands for the full lifecycle (install, login, connection ensure, action list, action run, request) plus a concrete flags table, covering the common cases fully.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The connection flow is sequenced with explicit state checks (READY, BUILDING, CLIENT_ACTION_REQUIRED) and a poll-after-action feedback loop, but step numbering is inconsistent ('1b' with no '1a', dangling 'Step 2' references) creating minor gaps.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Content is well-organized into clear sections with no nested references and easy navigation, but at ~155 lines everything is inline with no split-out reference files, which is acceptable yet not ideal for the over-50-line threshold.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

62%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is functional: it identifies the platform, lists a few actions, and includes an explicit 'Use when' trigger. Its main weakness is generic action language ('manage data, records, automate workflows') that undersells InPlayer-specific capabilities like subscriptions and pay-per-view.

Suggestions

Replace generic verbs with InPlayer-specific actions, e.g. 'Manage assets, access grants, subscriptions, vouchers, and transactions'.

Expand the trigger clause to name concrete scenarios users would say, e.g. 'Use when the user wants to manage InPlayer assets, subscriptions, vouchers, or reports'.

Mention key entity terms (asset, subscription, voucher, transaction) so the description matches natural user requests.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain ('InPlayer integration') and lists several actions ('Manage data, records, and automate workflows'), but the actions are generic rather than concrete InPlayer-specific operations like subscriptions or pay-per-view, so it does not reach the comprehensive level.

3 / 5

Completeness

It answers both 'what' ('Manage data, records, and automate workflows') and 'when' ('Use when the user wants to interact with InPlayer data') with an explicit trigger clause, though the 'when' is somewhat generic rather than naming concrete scenarios.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

The trigger 'Use when the user wants to interact with InPlayer data' surfaces the natural keyword 'InPlayer', but offers no synonyms or common variations a user might say, fitting the 'some relevant keywords but missing variations' anchor.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

'InPlayer' is a specific named platform giving it a clear niche with low conflict risk, but the generic 'manage data, records' phrasing leaves minor overlap with other data-integration skills.

4 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
membranedev/application-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.