Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Highly actionable with executable commands and a well-sequenced connection workflow, but it is held back by an over-long inline action table, some redundant explanatory prose, and no external reference files for progressive disclosure.
Suggestions
Move the Popular actions table into a separate reference file (e.g., ACTIONS.md) and keep only a handful of examples inline.
Add a validation/verification checkpoint after destructive or batch actions like delete-issue and update-issue.
Trim the opening 'Linear is a project management tool...' paragraph since Claude already knows what Linear is.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient with concrete commands, but the Popular actions table repeats 19 actions already discoverable via `membrane action list`, and the opening paragraph restates what Linear is — knowledge Claude already has. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready CLI commands for install, login, connection ensure, polling, action search/run, and proxy requests, with flag tables covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The connection setup flow is clearly sequenced with state checks (READY/CLIENT_ACTION_REQUIRED/CONFIGURATION_ERROR) and a polling loop, but post-action verification and error-recovery feedback for batch/destructive actions (e.g., delete-issue, update-issue) are absent. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Has clear section structure but everything lives inline in SKILL.md with no bundle files; the large Popular actions table and reference-style flag options are content that could be split into a separate reference file. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |