CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

logoraisr

Logoraisr integration. Manage Organizations. Use when the user wants to interact with Logoraisr data.

52

Quality

59%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/logoraisr/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a practical, command-heavy guide that is mostly actionable and well-structured, but it carries some marketing/placeholder fluff and lacks explicit validation feedback loops for data-modifying operations.

Suggestions

Remove the marketing intro paragraph and the 'When to use which actions: Use action names and parameters as needed.' placeholder to tighten token use.

Add explicit verification steps after data-modifying actions (e.g. re-list the resource or check the JSON output for success) to build a validate → fix → retry loop.

Consolidate the duplicated action-discovery guidance in 'Searching for actions' and 'Popular actions' into a single section to reduce redundancy.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Most of the body is lean, command-driven content, but the marketing intro ('Logoraisr helps businesses create branded logos. It's used by marketing teams...') and the tautological placeholder 'When to use which actions: Use action names and parameters as needed.' add unnecessary tokens.

3 / 5

Actionability

It provides concrete, mostly copy-paste-ready commands for install, login, connect, list, run, and proxy, with a clear flag table; minor gaps come from ID placeholders and slight redundancy in the action-discovery commands.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A rough sequence exists (install → login → connect → discover → run → proxy), but operations that can modify Logoraisr data lack explicit validation or verification checkpoints, which caps this dimension at 3.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

With no bundle files present, the single-file body is well organized into clear headed sections; minor gaps are the weak Overview placeholder and redundancy between 'Searching for actions' and 'Popular actions'.

4 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Description

57%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description includes an explicit 'Use when' trigger and names a distinct product, but its 'what' is vague and slightly out of sync with the skill's actual scope. Stronger, more concrete capability and trigger language would lift it.

Suggestions

Replace the generic 'Manage Organizations' with concrete capabilities that match the body, e.g. 'Create and manage logos, brands, and projects in Logoraisr'.

Expand the trigger with natural user phrases such as 'Use when the user wants to design or manage logos, brand assets, or projects in Logoraisr'.

Align the description's stated scope with the body's Brand/Logo/Project model to avoid misleading Claude about what the skill does.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The phrase "Manage Organizations" names the domain (Logoraisr) but the single verb "Manage" is generic and minimal, and it does not match the body's actual scope (logos, brands, projects).

2 / 5

Completeness

Both a 'what' ("Logoraisr integration. Manage Organizations.") and an explicit 'when' ("Use when the user wants to interact with Logoraisr data.") are present, though the 'when' is generic and could be more specific.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

It surfaces the natural brand keyword "Logoraisr" in the trigger, but the phrasing "interact with Logoraisr data" is generic and omits the concrete natural terms users would say (logo, brand, branding).

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Logoraisr is a named third-party product, giving it a clear niche with low conflict risk, but the generic trigger phrasing leaves minor overlap risk with adjacent integration skills.

4 / 5

Total

13

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
membranedev/application-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.