Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable integration skill whose concrete CLI commands and connection-state feedback loop are its strengths. The main drags are an unnecessary background intro paragraph, a duplicated action-discovery section, and a broken "Step 2" cross-reference.
Suggestions
Remove or shrink the opening "Mercado Pago is a popular Latin American online payments platform... similar to PayPal" paragraph; Claude does not need the product backstory.
Merge the "Searching for actions" and "Popular actions" sections, which both demonstrate `membrane action list --intent`, into one to eliminate redundancy.
Fix the broken "skip to Step 2" reference (there is no Step 2) and relabel "1b" with a matching "1a" or renumber the connection steps so the sequence is unambiguous.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The intro paragraph ("similar to PayPal", "widely used by merchants and consumers in Latin America for e-commerce transactions") explains background Claude does not need, and the action-list guidance is duplicated across "Searching for actions" and "Popular actions", so it is mostly efficient but carries several padded sections rather than just minor trimmings. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides copy-paste-ready commands for every common case (install, login, connection ensure/get with --wait, action list, action run with JSON input, request with a full flags table), covering the workflow concretely and executably. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The connection flow is a clear sequence with an explicit polling feedback loop and per-state handling (READY/BUILDING/CLIENT_ACTION_REQUIRED/CONFIGURATION_ERROR), but the instruction to "skip to Step 2" references a non-existent step and the "1b" heading has no matching "1a", leaving minor structural gaps that keep it below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the body is organized into clear, well-labeled sections with no content that needs splitting out, but at over 50 lines it carries minor organization gaps (the duplicated action-list sections and the broken Step 2 cross-reference) rather than the tight single-purpose structure that would score 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |