Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, command-rich integration guide with clear sequencing and connection-state validation. Its main weaknesses are minor redundancy, an undefined "Step 2" cross-reference, and reference-worthy material inlined in a single file.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean and command-driven with only minor over-explanation (e.g. "so you can focus on the integration logic rather than auth plumbing", "This will burn less tokens"), fitting the efficient-with-minor-trim anchor; it does not reach 5 due to light redundancy such as the repeated action-list command. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides concrete, copy-paste-ready commands for install, login, connection, action search/run, and proxy with a flag table, covering common cases; minor gaps (generic "/path/to/endpoint" and undefined "Step 2" reference) keep it just below fully executable 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | There is a clear install→login→connect→poll→search→run sequence with validation checkpoints via connection states (READY/BUILDING/CLIENT_ACTION_REQUIRED) and a re-poll feedback loop; the dangling "Step 2" reference and absence of an explicit final verification step are minor gaps that hold it at 4. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is a single, well-organized file with clear section hierarchy and no nested references; since no bundle files exist and there is nothing to navigate, it scores well-organized, but reference-like material (the proxy flag table, clientAction spec) could be split out, keeping it below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |