CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

nudgify

Nudgify integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows. Use when the user wants to interact with Nudgify data.

59

Quality

68%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/nudgify/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a well-organized, executable guide to driving Nudgify through the Membrane CLI, with a clear connection workflow and a useful proxy reference. Minor redundancy and slightly inconsistent section numbering keep it just short of the top anchor.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly lean commands with brief supporting prose; the only mild padding is the 'focus on the integration logic rather than auth plumbing' line and a repeated action-list command under 'Popular actions'. Matches 'efficient; minor instances of over-explanation that could be trimmed'. Not a 5 because of the duplicated discovery command and slightly promotional best-practice phrasing.

4 / 5

Actionability

It provides concrete, executable CLI commands with flags and a thorough proxy-options table covering install, auth, connection, search, run, and proxy use cases. Matches 'mostly executable guidance; concrete code or commands with minor gaps'. Not a 5 because placeholders (CONNECTION_ID, QUERY) must be filled and no concrete action-result example is shown.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

There is a clear install → login → connect → poll-until-ready → search → run sequence with a feedback loop for connection states (BUILDING/READY/CLIENT_ACTION_REQUIRED/CONFIGURATION_ERROR). Matches 'clear sequence with most checkpoints present; minor validation gaps'. Not a 5 because section numbering is inconsistent ('1b' with no '1a', an unlabeled 'Step 2') and 'Searching for actions' / 'Popular actions' overlap.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

With no bundle files present, all content lives in well-sectioned headers (install, auth, connecting, searching, running, proxy, best practices). Matches 'good structure; most content is appropriately placed; minor organization gaps'. Not a 5 because some inline material (the proxy flag table, best practices) could be split out and the actions sections are somewhat redundant.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Description

62%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description correctly answers both what the skill does and when to use it, and the named app gives it good distinctiveness. It is held back by generic action verbs and thin trigger-term coverage that lack synonyms or varied phrasings.

Suggestions

Replace generic verbs ('Manage data, records, and automate workflows') with Nudgify-specific concrete actions such as creating nudges, managing social-proof notifications, or reading conversion stats.

Broaden the trigger clause with natural variations, e.g. 'Use when the user wants to display social proof, set up Nudgify notifications, or interact with Nudgify data.'

Add common keyword synonyms (e.g. 'social proof', 'notification widgets', 'conversion notifications') so users phrasing the request differently still match.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description names the domain ("Nudgify integration") and lists several actions ("Manage data, records, and automate workflows"), but those actions are generic verbs rather than Nudgify-specific concrete capabilities, matching the 'names domain and 1-2 concrete actions, but not comprehensive' anchor. Not a 2 because more than one action is named; not a 4 because the actions lack concrete specificity.

3 / 5

Completeness

Both 'what' ("Manage data, records, and automate workflows") and 'when' ("Use when the user wants to interact with Nudgify data") are present and explicit, matching the 'has both what and when; when could be more explicit or specific' anchor. Not a 5 because the trigger is a single phrase rather than concrete multiple trigger phrases, and the 'what' is somewhat generic.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

It includes the natural keyword "Nudgify" and the phrase "interact with Nudgify data", but offers only one framing with no synonyms or variations, matching 'some relevant keywords but missing common variations or synonyms'. Not a 4 because coverage is thin with no alternate phrasings users might say.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Naming the specific app "Nudgify" gives it a clear niche and low conflict risk, but the generic 'manage data, records, automate workflows' phrasing could overlap with other data-management skills, matching 'mostly distinct; minor overlap risk'. Not a 5 because the generic action verbs slightly dilute the distinct trigger.

4 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
membranedev/application-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.