Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill body is highly actionable with copy-paste commands, a clear connection state-machine workflow, and clean sectioning, though it slightly over-explains auth handling and inlines reference-grade detail that could live in separate files.
Suggestions
Tighten the repeated explanations of Membrane's auth handling into one concise statement to trim token usage.
Add an explicit post-action verification step (check the `output`/`error` fields and retry on failure) for action runs and proxy requests.
Move the detailed clientAction schema and proxy flag table into a REFERENCES file and link to it, keeping the body a lean overview.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean command-and-output oriented prose that assumes Claude's competence with CLI and HTTP concepts, with only minor over-explanation such as restating that Membrane handles auth in multiple places; it fits 'Efficient; minor instances of over-explanation that could be trimmed' rather than the perfectly lean score-5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides copy-paste-ready commands with flags (e.g. `membrane connection ensure "https://www.paypro.nl/" --json`, `membrane action run <actionId> --connectionId=CONNECTION_ID --input '{...}' --json`) and a flag table covering the common cases, matching 'Fully executable; copy-paste ready code or commands; specific examples cover the common cases'. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The connect-to-PayPro flow is clearly sequenced with a state machine (READY / CLIENT_ACTION_REQUIRED / CONFIGURATION_ERROR) and a polling loop, but it lacks an explicit validate-then-retry feedback loop for batch/destructive action runs, fitting 'Clear sequence with most checkpoints present; minor validation gaps'. It is not capped at 3 because no destructive operation is performed without the user completing auth, but it is not a 5 because post-action verification is absent. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well-organized into labeled sections (Install, Authentication, Connecting, Searching, Popular actions, Best practices) with no bundle files to offload detail into, fitting 'Good structure; most content is appropriately placed; references mostly clear; minor organization gaps'. It is not a 5 because there are no external references at all and some reference-grade material (the clientAction schema, proxy flag table) is fully inlined. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |