Conciseness

The body is mostly efficient with copy-paste commands, but it opens with a marketing paragraph explaining what Peoplelogic is ('AI-powered platform that helps companies understand and improve their team's performance...') and includes fluff like 'so you can focus on the integration logic rather than auth plumbing' that Claude does not need, matching the score-3 anchor ('Mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation or could be tightened'). It is not a 2 because the bulk is genuinely lean command reference.

Actionability

It provides concrete, executable commands throughout (install, login, connection ensure, polling, action list/run, request proxy) plus a flags table, matching the score-4 anchor ('Mostly executable guidance; concrete code or commands with minor gaps'). It falls short of 5 because the 'Popular actions' section promises actions but only restates the discovery command, and the Overview entities lack any example action names.

Workflow Clarity

The connection workflow is sequenced with a real feedback loop — poll with --wait, then branch on READY / CLIENT_ACTION_REQUIRED / CONFIGURATION_ERROR with explicit recovery steps — matching the score-4 anchor ('Clear sequence with most checkpoints present; minor validation gaps'). It is not a 5 because the 'skip to Step 2' reference points to a Step 2 that is never explicitly defined, leaving a small navigation gap.

Progressive Disclosure

The single SKILL.md is well-organized into clearly signaled sections (Overview, Working with Peoplelogic, Install, Auth, Connecting, Searching, Popular actions, Proxy, Best practices) with one external docs link and no nested file references, matching the score-4 anchor ('Good structure; most content is appropriately placed; references mostly clear'). It does not reach 5 because the thin 'Popular actions' section is a minor organization gap and the file exceeds the simple-skill line.

Specificity

The description names the Peoplelogic domain but its actions are minimal and generic — 'Manage data, records, and automate workflows' lists no concrete operations, matching the score-2 anchor ('Names the domain but actions are minimal or generic'). It does not reach score 3 because none of the actions are specific (e.g. 'list employees', 'pull feedback').

Completeness

Both 'what' ('Manage data, records, and automate workflows') and an explicit 'when' ('Use when the user wants to interact with Peoplelogic data') are present, matching the score-4 anchor where both exist but the 'when' could be more specific. The 'Use when' clause is explicit so it is not capped at 3, but the vague 'what' keeps it below 5.

Trigger Term Quality

It surfaces the brand keyword 'Peoplelogic' and broad terms ('data', 'records', 'workflows') via 'Use when the user wants to interact with Peoplelogic data', but it misses natural variations or synonyms a user might actually say, fitting the score-3 anchor ('Some relevant keywords but missing common variations or synonyms'). It is not a 4 because no file extensions or concrete task phrases are present.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Anchoring triggers to the specific brand 'Peoplelogic' gives it a clear niche with minimal conflict risk, but the generic action verbs ('manage data', 'automate workflows') could overlap with other data-integration skills, matching the score-4 anchor ('Mostly distinct; minor overlap risk with closely related skills') rather than the fully-distinct score-5 example.