CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

piloterr

Piloterr integration. Manage Organizations, Pipelines, Users, Goals, Filters. Use when the user wants to interact with Piloterr data.

57

Quality

66%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/piloterr/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a well-structured, actionable guide to driving Piloterr through the Membrane CLI, with a clear sequenced workflow and explicit state-handling checkpoints. It loses points mainly to mild prose padding and the absence of a concrete real Piloterr action example.

Suggestions

Trim padding: drop the OKR intro paragraph, "Use action names and parameters as needed," and the "auth plumbing" aside.

Add at least one fully concrete Piloterr action example (real actionId and --input JSON) so the run/proxy sections are copy-paste ready end-to-end.

Resolve the dangling "Step 2" reference by labeling the subsequent section (e.g. "### Step 2: Search and run actions") to make the workflow sequence explicit.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly efficient with executable commands, but includes unnecessary padding such as the OKR intro paragraph, "Use action names and parameters as needed," and "so you can focus on the integration logic rather than auth plumbing."

3 / 5

Actionability

Concrete, copy-paste-ready CLI commands cover install, login, connection, action listing/running, and proxy requests; the minor gap is that no real Piloterr action example with actual parameters is shown.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The install→authenticate→connect→poll→search→run sequence is clear, with explicit state checkpoints (READY/BUILDING/CLIENT_ACTION_REQUIRED) and a poll-again feedback loop; the unlabeled "Step 2" reference is a minor gap.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Content is well-organized under clear section headers with no nesting; there are no bundle files so everything is appropriately inline, though a few dense reference sections (proxy flags, clientAction fields) could be split out.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

66%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description cleanly answers both what and when and is highly distinct, but its action verb is generic and its trigger terms lack natural synonyms. Tightening the verb and adding user-natural keywords would lift specificity and trigger quality.

Suggestions

Replace the generic verb "Manage" with distinct concrete actions (e.g. "Create, update, and list Organizations, Pipelines, Users, Goals, and Filters").

Broaden trigger terms to natural user phrasing such as "OKRs", "goals", "Piloterr API", or "Piloterr data".

Make the "Use when" clause more specific than "interact with Piloterr data" — name the actual tasks users request.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

"Manage Organizations, Pipelines, Users, Goals, Filters" names the domain and several concrete objects, but relies on a single generic verb ("Manage") rather than distinct actions, so it sits between the 1-2-action and several-action anchors.

3 / 5

Completeness

It gives an explicit "what" ("Manage Organizations, Pipelines, Users, Goals, Filters") and an explicit "when" ("Use when the user wants to interact with Piloterr data"), though the trigger could be more specific.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

"Use when the user wants to interact with Piloterr data" surfaces the core keyword "Piloterr", but lacks natural synonyms or variations a user might actually say (e.g. "OKRs", "goals", "Piloterr API").

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

"Piloterr integration" / "interact with Piloterr data" carves out a clear, brand-specific niche with distinct triggers and minimal overlap with other skills.

5 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
membranedev/application-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.