CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

practitest

PractiTest integration. Manage Projects. Use when the user wants to interact with PractiTest data.

60

Quality

70%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/practitest/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is well-structured and highly actionable with a clear connection-lifecycle state machine, penalized mainly for missing concrete examples of PractiTest-specific actions and minor verbosity. It is a solid, copy-paste-ready guide.

Suggestions

Add one or two concrete worked examples for the most common PractiTest actions, e.g. listing test cases and creating a test run with actual action ids and --input payloads.

Trim the opening overview paragraph ("PractiTest is a test management tool that helps QA teams...") since it explains a concept Claude already knows.

Add an explicit validation/check step after running an action (e.g. inspect the output field or re-query to confirm the change) to complete the action workflow's feedback loop.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly efficient executable commands, with only minor over-explanation such as the opening PractiTest overview paragraph and the "focus on the integration logic rather than auth plumbing" aside that could be trimmed.

4 / 5

Actionability

It provides concrete, executable membrane/npx commands with flags and JSON examples, but lacks concrete examples for the common PractiTest-specific actions (Tests/Test Sets/Runs/Issues), which are only listed as bare bullets.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The connection lifecycle is a clearly sequenced state machine with explicit checkpoints and a poll-act-repoll feedback loop, though validation of action results after running an action is only implicit.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist and all content is inline, but the body is well-organized with clear section headers and no nested or buried references; minor organization gaps such as the inline proxy-options table keep it just below a 5.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Description

66%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is distinct and includes an explicit Use-when clause, but its specificity is limited to one action and its trigger phrasing is generic. Listing concrete capabilities (test cases, test runs, requirements, issues) would raise both specificity and trigger quality.

Suggestions

Replace the generic "Manage Projects" with the skill's actual concrete capabilities, e.g. "Manage test cases, test sets, runs, requirements, and issues in PractiTest."

Expand the Use-when clause with concrete triggers, e.g. "Use when the user wants to create or update test cases, run tests, or file/track issues in PractiTest."

Add common natural phrasing variations (e.g. "test management", "QA test runs") so the trigger matches more user queries.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

"Manage Projects" names the domain plus one concrete action, but coverage is thin and slightly misaligned with the skill's actual scope (Tests/Test Sets/Runs/Issues) rather than several specific actions.

3 / 5

Completeness

It states a clear "what" ("PractiTest integration. Manage Projects.") and an explicit "Use when..." clause, but the when-clause could be more specific with concrete trigger phrases.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

The proper noun "PractiTest" is a natural keyword a user would say, but the trigger phrasing "interact with PractiTest data" is generic and lacks synonyms or common variations.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

"PractiTest integration" names a unique proprietary tool, giving it a clear niche with a distinct trigger term and minimal conflict risk with other skills.

5 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
membranedev/application-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.