CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

ratecard

Ratecard integration. Manage Clients, Users. Use when the user wants to interact with Ratecard data.

61

Quality

72%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/ratecard/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is highly actionable with executable commands throughout and a clear connection-state workflow, supported by good section structure. Its main weaknesses are minor verbosity in the intro and inconsistent step numbering in the connection flow.

Suggestions

Fix the step numbering: label explicit "Step 1" and "Step 2" sections so the "skip to Step 2" and "1b" references resolve.

Trim the opening paragraph about what Ratecard is and the "focus on the integration logic rather than auth plumbing" aside to save tokens.

Add a brief validation checkpoint after `membrane action run` (e.g. check the `output`/error fields) to strengthen the workflow feedback loop.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly lean commands and brief explanations, but includes minor padding such as the opening business description of Ratecard and "so you can focus on the integration logic rather than auth plumbing" that could be trimmed.

4 / 5

Actionability

It provides copy-paste-ready commands for every common case (install, login, connection ensure, polling, action list/run, request) plus a thorough proxy flag table, fully executable with specific examples.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The install→auth→connect→search→run sequence is clear with state-machine checkpoints (READY/BUILDING/CLIENT_ACTION_REQUIRED) and polling guidance, but step numbering is inconsistent ("Step 2" and "1b" referenced without matching Step 1/2 labels), leaving minor gaps.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist and the single SKILL.md is well-organized with clear section headers; the inline CLI command reference is reasonable, though some reference material could be split out, leaving minor organization gaps.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

62%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is third-person, covers both what and when, and names a specific app, but its actions and triggers are generic ("Manage", "interact with Ratecard data") rather than concrete. It sits solidly above midpoint with room to add specific verbs and natural trigger phrases.

Suggestions

Replace the generic verb "Manage" with concrete actions, e.g. "Create, update, and list Clients and Users".

Expand the when-clause with natural trigger phrases users would say, e.g. "Use when the user mentions Ratecard, pricing quotes, clients, or users".

Mention the core Ratecard objects (Ratecards, Sections, Items, Currencies) to improve distinctiveness from generic CRM skills.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

"Manage Clients, Users" names the domain plus two concrete objects, but the verb "Manage" is generic and coverage is not comprehensive, matching the names-domain-and-1-2-actions anchor.

3 / 5

Completeness

It states both what ("Ratecard integration. Manage Clients, Users.") and when ("Use when the user wants to interact with Ratecard data."), but the when-clause is generic rather than listing concrete trigger phrases, fitting the both-present-but-could-be-more-specific anchor.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Triggers rely on the app name "Ratecard" and the phrase "interact with Ratecard data"; relevant but missing natural synonyms or variations a user might actually say.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Naming the specific Ratecard app gives it a clear niche with low conflict risk, but "Clients, Users" overlaps with many CRM/sales tools, leaving minor overlap risk rather than fully distinct triggers.

4 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
membranedev/application-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.