CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

raven-tools

Raven Tools integration. Manage Organizations. Use when the user wants to interact with Raven Tools data.

62

Quality

73%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/raven-tools/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body delivers highly actionable, executable CLI guidance with a strong validated connection workflow. It would benefit from trimming explanatory prose and potentially offloading the proxy-flag reference table and action catalog to separate reference files.

Suggestions

Trim non-essential prose such as 'so you can focus on the integration logic rather than auth plumbing' and condense the best-practices bullets to actionable directives.

Consider moving the proxy request flag table and the full Raven Tools tool/action catalog into a separate reference file (e.g., REFERENCE.md) and linking from the overview to improve progressive disclosure.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly efficient with executable commands, but retains some padding such as the 'focus on the integration logic rather than auth plumbing' aside and prose-heavy best-practice bullets that could be tightened.

3 / 5

Actionability

It provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands for login, connection ensure/get, action list/run, and request proxying, with concrete flags and JSON input examples covering the common cases.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The connection setup workflow is clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints — polling BUILDING to READY, branching on CLIENT_ACTION_REQUIRED with described clientAction fields, and re-polling after the user acts — including error-recovery feedback loops.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Content is well-organized into clear sections (Overview, Working with Raven Tools, Popular actions, Proxy requests, Best practices) with no nested references, though all content is inlined in a single ~150-line file rather than split into reference files.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

66%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is concise, uses third person, and includes an explicit 'Use when' trigger tied to a distinct named product. Its main weakness is thin capability coverage — only 'Manage Organizations' is named despite the body covering SEO reports, social, and ads tooling.

Suggestions

Expand the 'what' to name the concrete capabilities shown in the body (e.g., pull SEO rank tracking, site auditor, and advertising reports) instead of only 'Manage Organizations'.

Broaden the 'Use when' clause to mirror the natural phrases a user would say, such as 'SEO reports', 'rank tracking', or 'Raven Tools reports'.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description names the domain (Raven Tools) and only one concrete action ('Manage Organizations'), matching the anchor for domain plus 1-2 concrete actions without comprehensive coverage.

3 / 5

Completeness

Both a 'what' ('Raven Tools integration. Manage Organizations.') and an explicit 'when' ('Use when the user wants to interact with Raven Tools data.') are present, though the trigger clause is fairly narrow.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

It includes relevant natural terms ('Raven Tools', 'interact with Raven Tools data') but lacks common variations or synonyms beyond the product name itself.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Naming a specific commercial product (Raven Tools) carves a clear niche with distinct triggers and minimal overlap risk with other skills.

5 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
membranedev/application-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.