CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

rutter

Rutter integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows. Use when the user wants to interact with Rutter data.

56

Quality

65%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/rutter/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is a strong, executable CLI workflow with explicit connection-state validation checkpoints, held back slightly by a padded intro and minor sequencing/labeling inconsistencies rather than structural problems.

Suggestions

Trim the introductory paragraph about who uses Rutter and the "focus on integration logic rather than auth plumbing" aside to reduce unneeded explanation.

Replace the dangling "Skip to Step 2" / "1b" labels with a consistent numbered step sequence so the connection-to-action flow is unambiguous.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly lean command documentation, but the intro ("Rutter is an API that provides unified access... used by developers and companies... for accounting, lending, or inventory management") and phrases like "so you can focus on the integration logic rather than auth plumbing" add explanation Claude does not need.

3 / 5

Actionability

Concrete, executable commands are provided throughout (membrane login, connection ensure, action run, request proxy) with flag tables and JSON examples; minor gaps remain where placeholders like CONNECTION_ID and <actionId> require substitution.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The sequence (install, auth, connect, poll until READY, search actions, run) is clear with explicit state checkpoints (READY/BUILDING/CLIENT_ACTION_REQUIRED/CONFIGURATION_ERROR), but references to "Step 2" and a lone "1b" heading without a numbered step framework introduce minor gaps.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist and the skill is a single well-sectioned document with clear ## headings; it is over 50 lines and could arguably split the proxy flag table or action schema details into reference files, but the organization is solid.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

62%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is well-formed with both a what and an explicit Use-when trigger tied to a distinctive named API, but its capability wording is generic and the trigger lacks concrete scenario synonyms.

Suggestions

Replace generic verbs ("Manage data, records") with concrete Rutter actions such as "fetch orders, sync products, and query customer records".

Expand the Use-when clause with natural trigger scenarios, e.g. "Use when the user wants to query Rutter orders, products, subscriptions, or e-commerce data."

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Phrases "Manage data, records, and automate workflows" name the Rutter domain and a few actions, but the actions are generic ("manage", "records") rather than concrete capabilities like fetching orders or syncing products.

3 / 5

Completeness

It states a clear "what" ("Rutter integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows.") and an explicit "when" ("Use when the user wants to interact with Rutter data."), but the when clause could be more specific about triggering scenarios.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

The trigger "Use when the user wants to interact with Rutter data" surfaces the core term "Rutter" and "data", but it lacks synonyms or scenario variations a user might naturally say (e.g. orders, products, e-commerce sync).

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

"Rutter" is a specific named API giving a clear niche with low conflict risk, but the generic "manage data, records, automate workflows" phrasing leaves minor overlap with general data-management skills.

4 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
membranedev/application-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.