CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

sailpoint

SailPoint integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows. Use when the user wants to interact with SailPoint data.

53

Quality

60%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/sailpoint/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a well-structured, actionable CLI guide with genuine validation/polling checkpoints in the connection workflow. Its main weaknesses are mild verbosity/redundancy and a lack of progressive disclosure into reference files.

Suggestions

Remove the duplicate 'membrane action list' command and trim explanatory filler like 'so you can focus on the integration logic rather than auth plumbing'.

Move the clientAction schema details and the proxy flags table into a separate reference file (e.g. REFERENCES.md) and link to it from SKILL.md.

Replace the loose 'skip to Step 2' phrasing with explicit numbered steps so the connection workflow sequence is unambiguous.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Mostly efficient command examples, but it explains context Claude largely knows (what SailPoint is, 'so you can focus on the integration logic rather than auth plumbing') and repeats the action-list command in two places; could be tightened.

3 / 5

Actionability

Provides many concrete, copy-paste-ready commands (connection ensure, action run, request) and a proxy flag table, with only minor gaps like the unresolved CONNECTION_ID placeholder.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Clear install→auth→connect→poll→search→run sequence with a real validation feedback loop (polling connection state through READY/BUILDING/CLIENT_ACTION_REQUIRED/CONFIGURATION_ERROR), slightly held back by loose 'Step 2' references without matching numbered steps.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Well-organized into headers but entirely monolithic with no external references, and detail blocks (clientAction schema, proxy flag table) are inlined that could live in separate files; structure is present but not split.

3 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Description

57%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is third-person, names a clear niche (SailPoint), and includes an explicit 'Use when' trigger, satisfying both what and when. It is weakened by generic action verbs and limited keyword variation.

Suggestions

Replace generic verbs ('manage data, records, automate workflows') with concrete SailPoint-specific actions (e.g., 'list identities, manage entitlements, review access campaigns').

Add natural trigger synonyms and entity terms users say (e.g., 'identities, access, entitlements, governance') alongside 'SailPoint data'.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the SailPoint domain but the actions ('Manage data, records, and automate workflows') are generic verbs rather than concrete operations, matching the 'names domain but actions minimal or generic' anchor.

2 / 5

Completeness

Both 'what' (SailPoint integration managing data, records, workflows) and 'when' ('Use when the user wants to interact with SailPoint data') are present, though the 'when' could be more specific.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes the natural keyword 'SailPoint' and a usable trigger phrase ('interact with SailPoint data'), but lacks synonyms or common variations users might say.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

SailPoint is a distinct product niche with a clear trigger, giving minimal conflict risk; the generic 'manage data, records' phrasing keeps it just below a 5.

4 / 5

Total

13

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
membranedev/application-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.