Content
61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable CLI reference with strong command examples, but it includes some concept padding and its destructive action/proxy workflows lack explicit validation checkpoints. The broken "Step 2" reference also weakens workflow clarity.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation/verification checkpoint before running actions or proxy requests that could be destructive (e.g. confirm the action's outputSchema or dry-run a payment before initiating).
Fix the dangling "skip to Step 2" reference by labeling the corresponding section (e.g. "## Step 2: Search and run actions").
Trim the opening paragraph explaining what Salt Edge is and remove the filler line "When to use which actions: Use action names and parameters as needed." to improve token efficiency.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient command reference, but it pads with concepts Claude knows ("Salt Edge is a service that provides open banking solutions...") and filler like "When to use which actions: Use action names and parameters as needed.", fitting the score-3 anchor of mostly efficient with some unnecessary explanation. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete executable commands throughout (install, login, connection ensure, action list/run, request with a full flag table), with only minor gaps like placeholder CONNECTION_ID/actionId values, matching the score-4 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The connect-to-poll-to-action sequence is present with state-polling checkpoints, but it references a "Step 2" that is never labeled and the action-run/proxy-request flow (which can initiate payments or send DELETE/POST) lacks explicit validation, so the destructive-operation cap of 3 applies. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is organized into clear headed sections with no nested references and a single external docs link; it is over 50 lines so the simple-skill exception does not apply, but the structure is good with only minor organization gaps, matching the score-4 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |