CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

secureship

Secureship integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows. Use when the user wants to interact with Secureship data.

57

Quality

65%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/secureship/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a solid, actionable Membrane CLI integration guide with executable commands, a useful flag table, and real connection-state validation. It loses points on minor verbosity, a broken "Step 2" reference, and a "Popular actions" section that doesn't actually list actions.

Suggestions

Trim the introductory prose about what Secureship is and the "fastest way to get a connection" narration to tighten token use.

Fix the dangling "skip to Step 2" reference by labeling the searching/running-actions section as Step 2, or restructure the flow as an explicit numbered connect→search→run sequence.

Populate "Popular actions" with a few concrete example actions instead of only redirecting to discovery.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly lean command-driven content, but explanatory prose like the Secureship intro paragraph and "This is the fastest way to get a connection…" could be trimmed, fitting between anchors 3 and 4.

3.5 / 5

Actionability

It provides concrete, executable commands throughout (connection ensure, action run, request proxy) plus a complete flag table; the only gap is "Popular actions" redirecting to discovery instead of listing examples, landing just above anchor 4.

4.5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Connection setup has real state-based checkpoints (READY/CLIENT_ACTION_REQUIRED/CONFIGURATION_ERROR) with a poll loop, but "skip to Step 2" references an unlabeled step and the overall connect→search→run flow isn't a clean numbered sequence, fitting between anchors 3 and 4.

3.5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

With no bundle files, the self-contained body is organized into clear, well-labeled sections; it sits at anchor 4 rather than 5 because some inlineable detail (the proxy flag table, clientAction spec) could be split out.

4 / 5

Total

15.5

/

20

Passed

Description

60%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description correctly includes an explicit "Use when" trigger and names the Secureship product, giving it decent completeness and distinctiveness. Its main weakness is generic action language that lacks the concrete shipping verbs (rates, labels, tracking) a user would actually say.

Suggestions

Replace generic verbs with concrete Secureship actions, e.g. "Compare shipping rates, print labels, and track shipments".

Add natural trigger phrases users say, such as "Use when the user wants to compare shipping rates, print labels, or track Secureship shipments".

Tie the "when" clause to specific tasks rather than the broad "interact with Secureship data".

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

It names the Secureship domain and several actions ("Manage data, records, and automate workflows"), but those verbs are generic abstractions rather than concrete shipping actions, fitting between anchor 2 and 3.

2.5 / 5

Completeness

It states both a "what" (manage data, records, automate workflows) and an explicit "when" ("Use when the user wants to interact with Secureship data"), matching anchor 4 since the "when" could be more specific.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

"Secureship" and "Secureship data" are relevant distinct keywords, but the description omits the natural action phrases users would say (labels, rates, tracking, shipments), matching anchor 3.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The named product "Secureship" gives a clear niche with low conflict risk, though the generic "manage data, records" verbs create minor overlap, matching anchor 4.

4 / 5

Total

13.5

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
membranedev/application-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.