Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is highly actionable with executable commands and a well-sequenced, checkpointed connection workflow, though it carries minor redundancy and inlines reference-grade detail that would benefit from a separate file. No validation step confirms action-run success beyond the response field.
Suggestions
Add an explicit post-run verification step (e.g., check the response `output`/`error` fields and retry or surface the error) to give the action-run workflow a clear feedback loop.
Move the proxy flag table and the clientAction state reference into a `references/` file referenced one level deep to improve progressive disclosure.
Trim the duplicated `membrane action list --intent=QUERY` command in 'Popular actions' since the same command already appears under 'Searching for actions'.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean — command snippets and a flag table with minimal prose — but includes some restatable detail (the multi-paragraph clientAction state breakdown and the repeated action-list command in 'Popular actions') that could be trimmed, fitting 'efficient; minor instances of over-explanation' rather than the fully lean level 5 or the padded level 3. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides copy-paste-ready, fully executable commands for install, auth, connection ensure/get with polling, action list/run with JSON input, and the proxy request with a complete flag table, covering the common cases — matching 'fully executable; copy-paste ready code or commands; specific examples cover the common cases.' | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The connection flow is clearly sequenced (ensure → poll --wait → branch on state) with explicit feedback checkpoints (poll again after user action, handle CLIENT_ACTION_REQUIRED/CONFIGURATION_ERROR), but there is no explicit verification that an executed action succeeded beyond reading the output field, so it sits at 'clear sequence with most checkpoints present; minor validation gaps' rather than level 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is a single SKILL.md with no bundle files and reasonable section headers, but content that could live in a separate reference (the proxy flag table and the detailed clientAction state reference) is inlined, matching 'some structure but could be better organized; content that should be separate is inline' rather than the well-split level 4. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |