CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

sidekick-ai

Sidekick AI integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows. Use when the user wants to interact with Sidekick AI data.

59

Quality

69%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/sidekick-ai/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is a well-structured, mostly executable CLI guide with strong connection-state checkpoints and clean sectioning. It is slightly padded in prose and could add explicit validation for action results, but it broadly earns high marks.

Suggestions

Trim the introductory marketing sentence ('AI-powered meeting assistant that helps users automate tasks...') since Claude does not need Sidekick AI's product positioning to use the skill.

Add an explicit validation step after running actions, e.g. checking the response 'output' field for errors before reporting success, to fully satisfy the feedback-loop expectation.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly executable commands with light explanatory framing, but small padding such as the marketing-style intro and 'This will burn less tokens' keeps it just below the lean score-5 anchor, matching score 4.

4 / 5

Actionability

It provides concrete, copy-paste-ready CLI commands with flags and JSON examples covering the common cases, with only minor gaps (e.g. omitted CONNECTION_ID substitution notes), fitting score 4 rather than the fully exhaustive score-5 example.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The connection flow is explicitly sequenced with state-based checkpoints (READY/BUILDING/CLIENT_ACTION_REQUIRED) and a re-poll loop, but the 'Running actions' section lacks an explicit validation/feedback step, leaving it at score 4 instead of 5.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist, so the self-contained body is appropriately organized into well-signaled sections (Install, Authentication, Connecting, Searching, Popular actions) with no nested references, satisfying the simple-skill exception for score 5.

5 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

60%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is short and includes a proper 'Use when' trigger with a distinct niche, but its action vocabulary is generic ('data, records, workflows') and the trigger terms lack natural synonyms. It is competent but not comprehensive.

Suggestions

Replace generic verbs ('Manage data, records, and automate workflows') with Sidekick-AI-specific actions such as scheduling meetings, taking notes, and managing follow-ups.

Expand the trigger clause with concrete phrases users would say, e.g. 'Use when the user wants to schedule, summarize, or follow up on meetings with Sidekick AI.'

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

"Manage data, records, and automate workflows" names the Sidekick AI domain plus a couple of concrete actions, but the actions are generic rather than comprehensive, matching the score-3 anchor.

3 / 5

Completeness

It gives a clear 'what' (manage data, records, automate workflows) and an explicit 'Use when' trigger, but the 'when' clause is somewhat generic, matching the score-4 anchor rather than the fully concrete score-5 example.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

"Use when the user wants to interact with Sidekick AI data" includes the natural keyword "Sidekick AI" but lacks synonyms or common phrasings a user would actually say, fitting the score-3 anchor.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Tying the skill explicitly to "Sidekick AI" gives it a clear niche with minimal overlap risk, though the generic 'data/records/workflows' phrasing leaves minor overlap with similar productivity skills, fitting score 4.

4 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
membranedev/application-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.