CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

tastyigniter

TastyIgniter integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows. Use when the user wants to interact with TastyIgniter data.

56

Quality

64%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/tastyigniter/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a largely executable, well-structured guide with strong auth/connection workflow checkpoints, undermined by some marketing padding and inconsistent command invocation plus broken step references. Progressive disclosure is reasonable for a single-file guide.

Suggestions

Trim the introductory marketing paragraph about what TastyIgniter is and the "auth plumbing" sentence to reduce padding.

Standardize invocation (pick `membrane` or `npx @membranehq/cli@latest` and use it consistently) to remove a source of confusion.

Fix the step numbering: rename "#### 1b" to a properly sequenced step and either label "Step 2" or replace the "Skip to Step 2" references with the actual section name.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly efficient with executable commands, but includes removable padding such as the marketing-style TastyIgniter intro ("It's used by restaurant owners and food businesses...") and "so you can focus on the integration logic rather than auth plumbing."

3 / 5

Actionability

Concrete, executable commands cover install, auth, connection, action search/run, and proxy with a flags table, but invocation is inconsistent ("membrane" vs "npx @membranehq/cli@latest") which is a minor gap.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The connect→search→run sequence has explicit state-based checkpoints and a poll/re-poll feedback loop, but navigation is weakened by a stray "#### 1b" heading and references to a "Step 2" that is never labeled.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Content is well-sectioned with clear headers and stays at an overview level with no nested reference chains; there are no bundle files, so organization rests on sectioning, which is good with minor gaps.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description covers what and when with a clear, distinct trigger tied to a named platform, but its action language is generic and the trigger phrasing lacks synonyms or variations. It is third-person and free of overt fluff.

Suggestions

Replace generic verbs ("Manage data, records, and automate workflows") with concrete TastyIgniter actions such as "create and update menu items, list and fulfill orders, manage customers and reservations".

Add natural trigger variations to the "Use when" clause, e.g. "when the user mentions online orders, menus, reservations, or restaurant management".

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

It names the TastyIgniter domain but the listed actions — "Manage data, records, and automate workflows" — are generic rather than concrete, matching the anchor where the domain is named but actions are minimal or generic.

2 / 5

Completeness

It states both a "what" ("TastyIgniter integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows.") and a "when" ("Use when the user wants to interact with TastyIgniter data."), though the trigger could be more specific.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

The keyword "TastyIgniter" is present and natural, but no synonyms or variations are offered, fitting the anchor of some relevant keywords missing common variations.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

TastyIgniter is a specific named platform, giving it a clear niche with distinct triggers and minimal conflict risk with other skills.

5 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
membranedev/application-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.