Name: thena
Rating: 56.8 (1 reviews)
Author: membranedev

Blog Docs Log in Get started

thena

Thena integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows. Use when the user wants to interact with Thena data.

Quality

65%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/thena/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is a well-structured, executable guide to driving Thena through the Membrane CLI, with a solid state-machine connection workflow and feedback loops. Its main weaknesses are an unnecessary marketing intro, an undefined 'Step 2' reference, and a 'Popular actions' section that underdelivers on its title.

Suggestions

Cut the introductory marketing paragraph about who uses Thena and its query/visualization performance; keep only the operational overview.

Define 'Step 2' explicitly (or relabel the sections) so the 'skip to Step 2' / '1b' references resolve to real headings.

Either populate 'Popular actions' with a few concrete Thena action examples or rename it to 'Discovering actions' to match what it actually shows.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is mostly tight command-based guidance, but the opening marketing paragraph ('Thena is a data analytics platform... used by data analysts, engineers, and product managers... fast query performance and real-time data visualization') and phrases like 'so you can focus on the integration logic rather than auth plumbing' are unnecessary context Claude does not need; fits 'mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation', not a 4 because the intro padding is clearly trimmable.	3 / 5
Actionability	Concrete, executable commands cover the common cases (install, login incl. headless, connection ensure, action list/run, request proxy) with a clear flags table; not a 5 because placeholders (CONNECTION_ID, actionId, QUERY) are never tied together in a single worked end-to-end example and the 'Popular actions' section restates discovery rather than listing actual popular actions.	4 / 5
Workflow Clarity	The connection flow is clearly sequenced with state-based checkpoints and a feedback loop (poll --wait, then re-poll after CLIENT_ACTION_REQUIRED); not a 5 because the text references 'Step 2' which is never defined, and the BUILDING/READY branching numbering ('1b') is slightly inconsistent.	4 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	A single self-contained file with well-organized section headers and no nested references (references/scripts/assets directories are empty), so navigation is easy; not a 5 because the 'Popular actions' section is thin and the proxy/clientAction detail could be more cleanly sectioned, leaving minor organization gaps.	4 / 5
	Total	15 / 20 Passed

Description

62%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description cleanly states both capability and an explicit use-trigger, and benefits from naming a specific platform (Thena) that limits conflict risk. It is held back by generic action verbs and a single trigger phrase lacking synonyms and concrete variations.

Suggestions

Replace generic verbs with concrete Thena actions, e.g. 'query metrics, build dashboards, manage records, and automate workflows'.

Expand the trigger to cover natural variations: 'Use when the user wants to query Thena data, build or view dashboards, manage records, or automate Thena workflows.'

Consider adding the data-source/dashboard framing so the 'what' is more specific than 'manage data'.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names the Thena domain plus three actions ('Manage data, records, and automate workflows'), but the verbs are generic rather than concrete (e.g. no 'build dashboards', 'query metrics'), matching the 'names domain and 1-2 concrete actions, not comprehensive' anchor; not a 4 because the actions lack specific, granular coverage.	3 / 5
Completeness	Both 'what' ('Manage data, records, and automate workflows') and an explicit 'when' ('Use when the user wants to interact with Thena data') are present; not a 5 because the 'when' offers one trigger phrase rather than multiple concrete trigger clauses, and the 'what' is somewhat generic.	4 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	The single trigger phrase 'Use when the user wants to interact with Thena data' gives the core keyword but misses natural synonyms and variations (dashboards, records, workflows, metrics); fits 'some relevant keywords but missing common variations', not a 4 due to thin coverage.	3 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	Naming the specific platform Thena gives a clear niche with low conflict risk, but the narrow trigger ('interact with Thena data') leaves minor overlap with generic data skills; fits 'mostly distinct; minor overlap risk' rather than the fully distinct anchor 5.	4 / 5
	Total	14 / 20 Passed

Validation

93%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning

	Total	15 / 16 Passed

Repository: membranedev/application-skills
Path: skills/thena/SKILL.md
Commit: f484c82

Reviewed: 4 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.