CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

tomato-pay

Tomato pay integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows. Use when the user wants to interact with Tomato pay data.

54

Quality

61%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Medium

Suggest reviewing before use

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/tomato-pay/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is actionable and well-structured, led by executable Membrane CLI commands and a genuine readiness-check feedback loop. Its main weaknesses are mild introductory padding and the absence of validation guidance for destructive payment/refund operations.

Suggestions

Add an explicit validation/confirmation checkpoint before running destructive actions like Payment or Refund (e.g. confirm amount and recipient, or run a dry-run/preview first).

Trim the introductory paragraph explaining what Tomato Pay is and incidental asides, since Claude can infer them.

Fix the dangling 'skip to Step 2' reference by either labeling the target section 'Step 2' or removing the cross-reference.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly efficient with concrete commands, but the intro paragraph ('Tomato Pay is a payment app that allows users to make and receive payments...') and asides like 'This is the fastest way to get a connection' explain what Claude could infer.

3 / 5

Actionability

Provides many copy-paste-ready CLI commands (install, login, connection ensure, action list/run, request proxy) plus a flags table covering the common cases, with only minor unresolved placeholders like CONNECTION_ID.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

There is a clear install→auth→connect→search→run sequence with a connection-readiness polling feedback loop, but the skill covers destructive Payment/Refund actions with no validation or confirmation guidance, capping workflow clarity at 3.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Content is well-organized into clearly headed sections with no nested references and no bundle files needed; a dangling 'skip to Step 2' reference and inline connection-state detail keep it just below a 5.

4 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Description

62%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is third-person, includes an explicit 'Use when' trigger, and names a distinct app, so it clears the completeness and distinctiveness bars. It is held back by generic action verbs and thin trigger-term coverage.

Suggestions

Replace generic verbs with concrete capabilities, e.g. 'Create and refund payments, manage merchants, and pull reports'.

Expand trigger terms with synonyms users actually say, such as 'payments, refunds, transactions, or payout records'.

Tighten the 'what' clause so the capability list is comprehensive rather than 'Manage data, records, and automate workflows'.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the Tomato pay domain plus a few actions ('Manage data, records, and automate workflows'), but the verbs are generic rather than the concrete, comprehensive actions of a 4 or 5.

3 / 5

Completeness

Both 'what' ('Manage data, records, and automate workflows') and an explicit 'when' ('Use when the user wants to interact with Tomato pay data') are present; the 'what' is somewhat generic, keeping it below a 5.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes the brand trigger 'Tomato pay' and a natural 'Use when the user wants to interact with Tomato pay data' phrase, but lacks synonyms or common variations beyond 'data'.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The named app 'Tomato pay' gives a clear niche with low conflict risk, though the generic 'data, records, workflows' wording leaves minor overlap with adjacent integration skills.

4 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
membranedev/application-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.