CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

truss

Truss integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows. Use when the user wants to interact with Truss data.

56

Quality

65%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/truss/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a strong, actionable CLI guide with a genuine validation loop for connection readiness and clean sectioning. Its weaknesses are a padded intro explaining Truss, placeholder-laden examples, and a broken 'Step 2' reference that slightly muddies the workflow.

Suggestions

Trim the opening paragraph that defines what Truss is; Claude does not need the platform overview, and removing it would lift conciseness.

Resolve the dangling 'Step 2' reference by labeling the searching/running section as Step 2, or rephrase to 'skip to Searching for actions'.

Provide one fully-resolved example with a concrete action id and connection id so the actionability examples are copy-paste ready without placeholders.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly efficient commands and examples, but the opening paragraph explaining what Truss is and asides like 'so you can focus on the integration logic rather than auth plumbing' are unnecessary explanation Claude does not need, fitting the 'mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation' anchor.

3 / 5

Actionability

Concrete, copy-paste-ready commands dominate (npm install, membrane login, connection ensure, action run) with a useful proxy flag table, but placeholders like CONNECTION_ID and <actionId> leave minor gaps versus the fully-specified common-cases anchor at 5.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

There is a clear install → authenticate → connect → poll-until-ready → search → run sequence with an explicit validation/feedback loop on connection state (READY/BUILDING/CLIENT_ACTION_REQUIRED), though the undefined 'Step 2' reference is a minor navigation gap keeping it below 5.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Content is well organized into clearly headed sections with no nested references and no bundle files that need splitting, but at ~140 lines it exceeds the under-50-line simple-skill threshold for a 5, so it sits at 'good structure, minor organization gaps'.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

62%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is concise and correctly pairs a 'what' with an explicit 'when' trigger, anchored on the distinct Truss product name. Its main weakness is generic action verbs and limited keyword variation, which cap specificity and trigger quality.

Suggestions

Replace generic verbs with concrete Truss actions (e.g., 'deploy and serve ML models, manage model versions and datasets') to lift specificity.

Add natural trigger synonyms users might say (e.g., 'Truss models', 'Truss deployment', 'Basetwo Truss') to broaden trigger term coverage.

Tighten the 'when' clause with concrete trigger phrases (e.g., 'Use when the user mentions Truss models, deployments, or model versions') to push completeness toward 5.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain (Truss) and a few actions ('Manage data, records, and automate workflows') but the verbs are generic and coverage is not comprehensive, matching the 'names domain and 1-2 concrete actions' anchor rather than the multi-action anchor at 4.

3 / 5

Completeness

Both 'what' (Truss integration, manage data/records, automate workflows) and an explicit 'when' ('Use when the user wants to interact with Truss data') are present, but the 'what' is somewhat generic so it stops short of the concrete-trigger anchor at 5.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Relevant keywords are present ('Truss', 'data', 'records', 'workflows', 'interact with Truss data') but common synonyms and variations are missing, fitting the 'some relevant keywords but missing common variations' anchor rather than the strong coverage at 4.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The repeated 'Truss' naming gives a clear niche with minimal conflict risk, though the generic 'manage data, records, workflows' phrasing leaves minor overlap risk with adjacent data skills, so it does not reach the fully distinct anchor at 5.

4 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
membranedev/application-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.