Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body delivers strong, executable CLI guidance with a well-structured connection state machine, but carries some introductory padding and a confusing dangling "Step 2" reference.
Suggestions
Remove or trim the "VideoAsk is a platform that..." overview and the "When to use which actions" filler line to improve token efficiency.
Fix the dangling "skip to Step 2" reference by labeling the post-connection steps (searching/running actions) as Step 2 explicitly.
Add a brief validation/confirmation checkpoint before running actions that mutate VideoAsk data, since the current run guidance has none.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient operational guidance but includes some unnecessary explanation (the introductory "VideoAsk is a platform that..." paragraph and filler like "When to use which actions: Use action names and parameters as needed.") that could be trimmed. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides concrete, copy-paste-ready commands across install, auth, connection, action discovery, action runs, and proxying, plus a flag table, with only minor gaps such as placeholder substitution paths. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The connection-readiness workflow has a clear state machine with polling feedback loops (BUILDING → READY / CLIENT_ACTION_REQUIRED → re-poll), though the dangling "skip to Step 2" reference and absence of validation before destructive action runs leave minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The single-file body is well organized into clear sections with no nested references and no bundle files to navigate; structure is good with only minor organization gaps for a CLI integration skill. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |