Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with executable commands and a clear multi-step workflow including validation via polling and state handling. It is well-structured for a single-file skill, with only minor conciseness and organization gaps.
Suggestions
Trim opinionated prose like 'so you can focus on the integration logic rather than auth plumbing' to keep the body lean.
Resolve the dangling 'skip to Step 2' reference by labeling the action-search/run section as Step 2 or removing the cross-reference.
Consider moving the detailed clientAction state machine and the proxy flag table into a separate reference file to shorten the main body.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean and command-driven with only minor over-explanation (e.g., 'so you can focus on the integration logic rather than auth plumbing'), fitting the 'efficient; minor instances that could be trimmed' anchor rather than the fully lean 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Copy-paste-ready commands cover the common cases end to end (install, login, connection ensure, polling, action list/run, request with flags), matching the fully executable anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear install→auth→connect→search→run sequence exists with a polling feedback loop and explicit state branching (READY/CLIENT_ACTION_REQUIRED/CONFIGURATION_ERROR), but the dangling 'skip to Step 2' reference without a labeled Step 2 is a minor checkpoint gap. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, so scoring reflects body structure: well-organized with clear section headers and no nested references, though the inlined clientAction detail and proxy flag table could arguably live in separate reference files, keeping it just below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |