Applies prioritization frameworks including RICE, ICE, Value vs Effort, and Kano model. Use when prioritizing features, managing backlog, making tradeoffs, or saying no gracefully. Based on Shreyas Doshi and Intercom frameworks.
92
89%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Quality
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a well-crafted skill description that excels across all dimensions. It names specific frameworks, provides clear trigger scenarios with natural language users would actually use, and establishes a distinct niche through methodology names and source attribution. The description is concise yet comprehensive.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions and frameworks: 'RICE, ICE, Value vs Effort, and Kano model' along with specific activities like 'prioritizing features, managing backlog, making tradeoffs, saying no gracefully.' | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both what ('Applies prioritization frameworks including RICE, ICE, Value vs Effort, and Kano model') and when ('Use when prioritizing features, managing backlog, making tradeoffs, or saying no gracefully') with explicit trigger guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes natural keywords users would say: 'prioritizing features', 'backlog', 'tradeoffs', 'saying no', plus specific framework names (RICE, ICE, Kano) that users familiar with these would search for. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Clear niche focused on prioritization frameworks with specific named methodologies (RICE, ICE, Kano) and attribution to specific sources (Shreyas Doshi, Intercom), making it highly distinguishable from generic product management skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
79%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-structured prioritization skill that efficiently presents the RICE framework and Value vs Effort matrix with actionable templates. The main weaknesses are the missing ICE and Kano frameworks promised in the description, and the lack of validation steps for ensuring prioritization decisions are sound before acting on them.
Suggestions
Add the ICE and Kano model frameworks mentioned in the skill description to deliver on the promised scope
Include a validation step in the workflow, such as 'Review scores with stakeholders before finalizing priority order' or 'Sanity check: does the ranking match intuition? If not, revisit confidence scores'
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is lean and efficient, presenting frameworks with minimal explanation. It assumes Claude understands basic concepts and jumps straight to formulas, examples, and templates without unnecessary preamble. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-paste ready templates with specific values and examples. The RICE formula is explicit with defined scales, and the Value vs Effort matrix gives clear action directives for each quadrant. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The checklist provides a sequence but lacks validation checkpoints. For prioritization decisions that could significantly impact product direction, there's no feedback loop or verification step to confirm scoring accuracy or stakeholder alignment. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well-organized with clear sections, but the skill mentions sources (Intercom, Shreyas Doshi) without linking to reference materials. For a skill under 50 lines, this is acceptable, but the ICE and Kano frameworks mentioned in the description are missing from the content. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
53530ef
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.