CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

prioritization-craft

Applies prioritization frameworks including RICE, ICE, Value vs Effort, and Kano model. Use when prioritizing features, managing backlog, making tradeoffs, or saying no gracefully. Based on Shreyas Doshi and Intercom frameworks.

92

Quality

89%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

Pending

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Discovery

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

This is a well-crafted skill description that excels across all dimensions. It names specific frameworks, provides clear trigger scenarios with natural language users would actually use, and establishes a distinct niche through methodology names and source attribution. The description is concise yet comprehensive.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple specific concrete actions and frameworks: 'RICE, ICE, Value vs Effort, and Kano model' along with specific activities like 'prioritizing features, managing backlog, making tradeoffs, saying no gracefully.'

3 / 3

Completeness

Clearly answers both what ('Applies prioritization frameworks including RICE, ICE, Value vs Effort, and Kano model') and when ('Use when prioritizing features, managing backlog, making tradeoffs, or saying no gracefully') with explicit trigger guidance.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural keywords users would say: 'prioritizing features', 'backlog', 'tradeoffs', 'saying no', plus specific framework names (RICE, ICE, Kano) that users familiar with these would search for.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Clear niche focused on prioritization frameworks with specific named methodologies (RICE, ICE, Kano) and attribution to specific sources (Shreyas Doshi, Intercom), making it highly distinguishable from generic product management skills.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Implementation

79%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a well-structured prioritization skill that efficiently presents the RICE framework and Value vs Effort matrix with actionable templates. The main weaknesses are the missing ICE and Kano frameworks promised in the description, and the lack of validation steps for ensuring prioritization decisions are sound before acting on them.

Suggestions

Add the ICE and Kano model frameworks mentioned in the skill description to deliver on the promised scope

Include a validation step in the workflow, such as 'Review scores with stakeholders before finalizing priority order' or 'Sanity check: does the ranking match intuition? If not, revisit confidence scores'

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The skill is lean and efficient, presenting frameworks with minimal explanation. It assumes Claude understands basic concepts and jumps straight to formulas, examples, and templates without unnecessary preamble.

3 / 3

Actionability

Provides concrete, copy-paste ready templates with specific values and examples. The RICE formula is explicit with defined scales, and the Value vs Effort matrix gives clear action directives for each quadrant.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The checklist provides a sequence but lacks validation checkpoints. For prioritization decisions that could significantly impact product direction, there's no feedback loop or verification step to confirm scoring accuracy or stakeholder alignment.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

Content is well-organized with clear sections, but the skill mentions sources (Intercom, Shreyas Doshi) without linking to reference materials. For a skill under 50 lines, this is acceptable, but the ICE and Kano frameworks mentioned in the description are missing from the content.

2 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation11 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
menkesu/awesome-pm-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.