Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, well-sequenced triage playbook with concrete tool calls, exact argument formats, and explicit validation gates for the parallel fan-out. It earns top marks on all four content dimensions.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | At ~13 lines the body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — no generic concept explanations — with dense operational detail ('Call crashlytics_get_report for topVersions with NO filter', 'hand-built strings silently match nothing'), so every token earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Gives concrete executable guidance: a named MCP tool (crashlytics_get_report), the exact filter format ('X.Y.Z (versionCode)'), a named subagent (crash-investigator), and `gh release list`; per the code-vs-instruction note, this actionable instruction-style guidance is not penalized for lacking verbatim code blocks. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear four-step numbered sequence (version context → top issues → fan out → verdict) with explicit validation checkpoints — 'map candidate versionCodes to releases via gh release list ... before picking' and 'verify the crashing versionCode against the fix's release before reporting' — satisfying the batch-operation feedback-loop requirement rather than being capped at 2. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no external references and no nested lookups, just four well-organized sections, which the rubric's simple-skills note explicitly allows to score 3 on progressive disclosure. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |