Conciseness

The body is lean and imperative throughout ('Follow MVI/UDF patterns.', 'Keep the ViewModel free of Android framework dependencies.', 'Add `kmpSmokeCompile` to the command when the feature touches a KMP module (most features do)'), with no explanations of concepts Claude already knows. The only trimmable token is the one-line '## Description' section restating the frontmatter — not enough to drop below anchor 5 ('lean and efficient; every token earns its place').

Actionability

Provides copy-paste-ready commands ('./gradlew spotlessApply spotlessCheck detekt detektTypeResolved assembleDebug test allTests', './gradlew assembleFdroidRelease :desktopApp:runRelease') plus exact file paths (gradle/libs.versions.toml, AppKoinModule.kt), dependency aliases (jetbrains-*, compose-multiplatform-*), and API names (stateInWhileSubscribed, @KoinViewModel, EntryProviderScope<NavKey>.myFeatureGraph()). Matches anchor 5 ('fully executable; copy-paste ready commands; specific examples cover the common cases') rather than 4, since commands are executable as-is and concrete names cover the common cases.

Workflow Clarity

A clear 6-step sequence (dependencies → state/ViewModels → UI → navigation/DI → platform separation → verify) with an explicit verification step and conditional additions (kmpSmokeCompile for KMP modules, ProGuard keep rules plus release-build commands). It stops short of anchor 5 because there is no explicit fix-and-revalidate feedback loop (e.g., 'if detekt/spotless fails, fix and re-run'), and it is above anchor 3 because validation commands are explicit rather than implicit or missing.

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist (references/, scripts/, assets/ are all absent) and the body is under 50 lines, well organized into six numbered sections, so the simple-skill exception applies: well-organized sections alone can score 5. The two cross-references to sibling skills ('see the compose-ui skill', 'see the testing-ci skill') are one level deep and clearly signaled. Not anchor 4 because there is no content misplaced inline or needing extraction.

Specificity

Names the domain ('adding a feature to Meshtastic-Android') and the overall action ('end-to-end workflow ... keeps KMP source sets and the architecture intact'), but does not enumerate the several concrete actions the workflow covers (dependencies, ViewModels, UI, navigation/DI, verification). It matches anchor 3 (1-2 concrete actions, not comprehensive) rather than 4, which requires a list of several specific actions.

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what ('The end-to-end workflow for adding a feature to Meshtastic-Android, in the order that keeps KMP source sets and the architecture intact') and when ('Use this whenever you start implementing a new feature or a sizeable behavior change, before writing any code') with a concrete trigger clause. Matches anchor 5 rather than 4 because the 'when' is explicit and specific, not just present.

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural phrases users would actually say: 'implementing a new feature', 'sizeable behavior change', 'before writing any code'. Missing common variations such as 'add a feature' or 'add functionality', so it sits at anchor 4 (good coverage, a few natural terms missing) rather than 5.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Scoped to a named codebase (Meshtastic-Android) with KMP/architecture qualifiers, giving it a clear niche with distinct triggers and minimal conflict risk with generic feature-implementation skills. Matches anchor 5; the codebase qualifier keeps it well above anchor 4's 'minor overlap risk with closely related skills'.