Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-sequenced review workflow with concrete commands, tables, and checklists. It is slightly verbose in places and monolithic, with no progressive disclosure of its longer process detail into reference files.
Suggestions
Tighten the Step 2 export-reachability paragraph and collapse the repeated "Tell the user" / "Share these links with the user" scaffolding into a shared convention.
Consider moving the lengthy breaking-change (Step 4) and deprecation (Step 5) processes into a reference file, keeping SKILL.md as a concise overview that links one level deep.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly dense and actionable with little concept-explanation fluff, but passages like the Step 2 export-reachability paragraph and the repeated "Tell the user" / "Share these links with the user" framing could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable commands (e.g. `git diff $(git merge-base HEAD origin/main)...HEAD`, `pnpm flub changeset add --empty`), concrete decision tables, exact branch/version rules, and a copy-paste TSDoc deprecation template. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Seven clearly sequenced steps with explicit stop conditions ("If all changes are @internal-only... stop"), a deprecation checklist, a user-confirmation gate before finalizing the changeset, and a final go/no-go summary. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well organized into labeled sections, but it is a single monolithic file over 50 lines with no external references; detailed reference-worthy material (breaking-change process, deprecation checklist) lives inline rather than being split out. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |