Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a lean, actionable instruction set for orchestrating subagents on large tasks, with a clear sequence and feedback loops. Its main weaknesses are minor over-explanation of context-window basics and the absence of a concrete example or template for subagent instructions and tests.
Suggestions
Trim or remove the line 'Each subagent has its own limited context window' since Claude already knows this.
Add a brief example of a subagent Task invocation and a sample behavior test so the guidance is copy-paste ready.
Replace the ad-hoc <required> wrapper with a standard markdown section header and an explicit validation checkpoint per subagent.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient and mostly assumes Claude's competence; only minor lines like 'Each subagent has its own limited context window' restate what Claude already knows. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, sequenced guidance (TodoWrite steps, Task tool usage, test-writing responsibility) with minor gaps such as no example test or invocation snippet. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The workflow is a clear sequenced list with explicit feedback loops ('Iterate until tests pass AND the code fits', final integration check), though it stops short of explicit validation checkpoints for each subagent's output. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | For a short single-file skill it is reasonably organized with a required-steps block and a Guidelines section, but the nonstandard <required> tag and bullet-heavy layout leave minor organization gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |