Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplary instruction-only skill: lean, unambiguous, and immediately executable, with concrete file paths, a named MCP tool, and a complete issue template. The only gap is the absence of a post-creation verification step (e.g., confirming the issue URL or deduplicating against existing open issues).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean: a short input spec, seven terse steps, the issue template, and one emphasis note — no concept explanations Claude already knows and no padded sections. Every section earns its place, matching anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is fully executable: concrete paths ('tests/reports/junit.xml', 'tests/reports/test-run-<timestamp>/<skillname>-<testname>/agent-metadata.md'), a named tool ('github-mcp-server-create_issue') with explicit owner/repo/title/labels parameters, and a complete copy-paste issue body template covering the common case. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 1-7 are clearly sequenced with an explicit ordering checkpoint ('REQUIRED - Write diagnosis BEFORE creating issue'). It falls short of anchor 5 because there is no validation/feedback loop — e.g., confirming the issue was created or checking for an existing duplicate issue — leaving a minor validation gap typical of anchor 4. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and none are needed: the skill is a single self-contained procedure organized into clear sections (Input, Steps, Important) with no content that belongs in a separate file and no nested references. Well-organized sections suffice for this skill, matching the top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |