Content
61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A concise, well-structured overview of the investigation workflow, but the steps read as a checklist of intentions rather than executable guidance — there are no commands, tool calls, or concrete procedures for downloading artifacts or analyzing logs. Adding validation checkpoints and concrete execution detail would lift the weaker dimensions.
Suggestions
Add concrete, executable detail to the steps: name the specific command/tool used to download run logs and artifacts (e.g. `gh run download <run-id>`), and specify where/how to read them, rather than 'Download the test logs and artifacts'.
Insert validation checkpoints into the workflow — e.g. confirm the artifact download succeeded and that the reported failure reproduces in the logs before diagnosing — and an explicit loop for re-examining logs if the initial diagnosis is inconclusive.
Give concrete guidance for the analysis step (what to look for in the logs, how to cross-reference the issue's prompt with the relevant skill under `plugins/*/skills`) instead of the generic 'analyze the test'.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean — a short purpose line, three 'When to Use' bullets, and five terse numbered steps — with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line earns its place, matching the lean/efficient anchor. Re-reading the 4 anchor (minor over-explanation to trim) does not fit better, since there is nothing extraneous to cut. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The steps are high-level hints ('Download the test logs and artifacts from the linked run', 'analyze the test with the prompt specified in the issue') with no commands, code, tool calls, or concrete specifics on how to download artifacts or where to look, fitting the minimal-concrete-guidance anchor. It is above the entirely-vague anchor (1) because it does name concrete objects (logs, artifacts, plugins/*/skills), but well below the executable anchors (3-4) which require real commands or code. | 2 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear five-step sequence is present, but for an investigative workflow it lacks validation checkpoints (e.g., confirming the artifact download succeeded or verifying the failure is reproduced before diagnosing) and error-recovery loops. The anchor-4 example uses concrete commands with a verify step; here steps are generic with no verification, and the cap note for missing validation in multi-step workflows further supports not exceeding 3. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a short single-purpose skill (under 50 lines) with well-organized sections (purpose, When to Use, Steps) and no external references needed; the simple-skill scoring note allows a 5 for clear, well-organized content without external file references. No bundle files exist, and none are referenced, so there is no nesting or buried-reference problem. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |