Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-sequenced, highly actionable 8-phase workflow with complete templates, concrete commands, and a duplicate-check validation step. It assumes Claude's competence and uses references appropriately, with only minor verbosity and the absence of explicit error-recovery loops in the final delivery phase.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validate-then-retry feedback loop to Phase 7 (e.g., verify the generated markdown renders and frontmatter is valid before delivering) to lift workflow_clarity to a 5.
Move the two large markdown templates into separate reference files (e.g., references/course-mission-template.md and references/special-ops-template.md) and link to them from the body to improve progressive_disclosure.
Trim the 'mission briefing officer' analogy paragraph — it is illustrative but adds tokens that do not directly advance the task.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean and assumes Claude's competence, but the two full markdown templates plus the 'mission briefing officer' analogy and some explanatory phrasing ('Think of this skill like...') add tokens that could be trimmed slightly. It does not over-explain basic concepts, keeping it above the midpoint. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides complete, copy-paste-ready markdown templates for both mission types, concrete file path conventions, specific commands (web_search, web_fetch with exact URLs and search queries), and explicit step-drafting rules (bold UI names, code-format values, placeholder conventions). | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 8-phase sequence (Phase 0–7) with an explicit duplicate-check checkpoint in Phase 1 ('If there's a close duplicate, surface it clearly') and a delivery checklist. However, the badge generation and file-write steps in Phase 7 lack an explicit validate-then-retry feedback loop, so it sits just below the anchor that requires explicit error-recovery loops. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized phased structure with one-level-deep references to a real bundle (references/tags.md) and clearly signaled repo-relative reference files (WRITING_STYLE.md, docs/recruit/index.md). The two full templates are inlined rather than split into separate files, which is a minor organization gap keeping it just below a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |