Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, highly actionable conversational workflow with explicit branching and concrete formatting rules, scoring at the top of the range on actionability, workflow clarity, and progressive disclosure. The only weakness is minor redundancy in the final step that keeps conciseness at the midpoint.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean bullet points without explaining concepts Claude already knows, but the closing instruction repeats itself: 'politely end the conversation and session. Do not continue asking follow-up questions. Do not ask any further questions.' Not a 3 because of that redundancy; not a 1 because there is no conceptual padding. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully concrete guidance: exact table columns, an A/B/C/D option scheme mapped to SharePoint Item IDs, required Key-detail fields (Manufacturer, Color, Purchase Price), and 80-120px image sizing. Not a 2 because nothing is left as vague direction; for an instruction-only skill this is copy-paste ready. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear five-step sequence (Clarify -> Look up -> Present -> If unavailable -> Confirm) with an explicit error-recovery branch for unavailable devices and a confirm gate before proceeding. Not a 2 because checkpoints are explicit rather than implicit; the destructive/batch cap does not apply to this conversational flow. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines with no external references needed and is organized into a well-structured ## Steps section, which per the guidelines earns a 3 for simple skills. Not a 2 because the structure is clean and monolithic text is avoided. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |