Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with concrete commands, a precise rubric, a gated multi-step workflow, and disciplined progressive disclosure. The only weakness is conciseness: the persona-set invariants are restated across several sections.
Suggestions
Consolidate the persona-set invariant (roster table, conditional rules, gotchas) into a single source of truth and cross-reference it instead of restating.
Trim the repeated restatements of "load persona files on demand / no sub-agents" to a single authoritative statement in the Notes section.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~420-line body is mostly efficient and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, but the roster, routing, conditional-panelist, and gotchas sections repeat the same persona-set invariants, so it could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides concrete `gh api`/`gh issue view` commands, an exact 6-outcome decision rubric, a full label taxonomy with construction rules, a numbered execution checklist, and a real template file referenced as assets/triage-template.md. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | An 8-step execution checklist with an explicit pre-arbitration completeness gate, a duplicate-link verification checkpoint, and a redo-and-repeat loop on gate failure provides clear sequencing with validation feedback. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is an overview that loads persona .agent.md files on demand and assets/triage-template.md only at synthesis time, with explicit no-pre-load instructions; the referenced asset exists and references are one level deep and clearly signaled. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |