Content
76%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-structured policy skill that respects token budget and gives concrete directives, supported by clearly signaled one-level references. Its gaps are the absence of a sequenced workflow with validation checkpoints and the lack of concrete artifact examples (a sample hook or template).
Suggestions
Add a short worked example of a conversion surface (one-line hook + runnable example + next step) so the central rule is immediately actionable.
Provide a lightweight sequenced workflow for a typical growth task (e.g., review change -> identify affected surfaces -> apply hook/example/next-step pattern -> annotate and escalate) with a verification/escalation checkpoint.
Clarify or relocate the persona reference (the ../../../.apm/agents/... path resolves outside the skill bundle); consider bundling a short persona summary inline or under references/ so the skill is self-contained.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and operational with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line (the gitignored WIP rule, the hook/example/next-step requirement, the framing and escalation rules) earns its place, matching the 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete and specific for an instruction-only skill ("one-line hook, a runnable example, and a clear next step", "Never stage or commit anything under WIP/", "annotate them with growth implications and escalate to the CEO"), but it states requirements rather than giving an example hook/template, leaving minor gaps versus fully copy-paste-ready direction. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Structure exists ("When to activate" trigger list plus "Key rules" policies) but there is no sequenced multi-step workflow or validation checkpoint; the skill spans several surfaces rather than a single unambiguous action, so it does not reach the clear-sequence-with-checkpoints anchors. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a concise overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references (the persona link and the WIP/growth-strategy.md source of truth) and clean sectioning, fitting the 'good structure; references mostly clear' anchor; the persona reference is a deep relative path with no bundle file present and the strategy file is gitignored/may-not-exist, leaving minor organization gaps versus the top anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |